These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15808021)

  • 1. A survey of GP attitudes to and experiences of email consultations.
    Neville RG; Marsden W; McCowan C; Pagliari C; Mullen H; Fannin A
    Inform Prim Care; 2004; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 15808021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Email consultations in general practice.
    Neville RG; Marsden W; McCowan C; Pagliari C; Mullen H; Fannin A
    Inform Prim Care; 2004; 12(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 15808022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice.
    Brant H; Atherton H; Ziebland S; McKinstry B; Campbell JL; Salisbury C
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Jul; 66(648):e460-6. PubMed ID: 27215571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audit of a sexual health website email link for general practitioners.
    Biggs K; Lowe P; Walsh J; Lagios K
    Int J STD AIDS; 2010 Jan; 21(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20029066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pandora's electronic box: GPs reflect upon email communication with their patients.
    Goodyear-Smith F; Wearn A; Everts H; Huggard P; Halliwell J
    Inform Prim Care; 2005; 13(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 16259859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-face-to-face consultations and communications in primary care: the role and perspective of general practice managers in Scotland.
    Hanna L; May C; Fairhurst K
    Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 22118332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of email in communication between the Finnish primary healthcare system and general practitioners.
    Karhula T; Kauppila T; Elonheimo O; Brommels M
    Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 22118333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experiences of using email for general practice consultations: a qualitative study.
    Atherton H; Pappas Y; Heneghan C; Murray E
    Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Nov; 63(616):e760-7. PubMed ID: 24267859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient, staff, and clinician perspectives on implementing electronic communications in an interdisciplinary rural family health practice.
    Chang F; Paramsothy T; Roche M; Gupta NS
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2017 Mar; 18(2):149-160. PubMed ID: 27995826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The place of information and communication technology-mediated consultations in primary care: GPs' perspectives.
    Hanna L; May C; Fairhurst K
    Fam Pract; 2012 Jun; 29(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 22006040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages and disadvantages of educational email alerts for family physicians: viewpoint.
    Badran H; Pluye P; Grad R
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e49. PubMed ID: 25803184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multispecialty telephone and e-mail consultation for patients with developmental disabilities in rural California.
    Hilty DM; Ingraham RL; Yang SP; Anders TF
    Telemed J E Health; 2004; 10(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 15689644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remote working: survey of attitudes to eHealth of doctors and nurses in rural general practices in the United Kingdom.
    Richards H; King G; Reid M; Selvaraj S; McNicol I; Brebner E; Godden D
    Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 22(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 15642724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Email Consultations Between Patients and Doctors in Primary Care: Content Analysis.
    Atherton H; Boylan AM; Eccles A; Fleming J; Goyder CR; Morris RL
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Nov; 22(11):e18218. PubMed ID: 33164902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice for pre-hospital thrombolysis.
    Bloe C; Mair C; Call A; Fuller A; Menzies S; Leslie SJ
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(1):1100. PubMed ID: 19278299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. General practitioners' perceptions of sharing workload in group practices: qualitative study.
    Branson R; Armstrong D
    BMJ; 2004 Aug; 329(7462):381. PubMed ID: 15265814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Email communication at the medical primary-secondary care interface: a qualitative exploration.
    Sampson R; Barbour R; Wilson P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Jul; 66(648):e467-73. PubMed ID: 27162209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic mail communication between physicians and patients: a review of challenges and opportunities.
    Antoun J
    Fam Pract; 2016 Apr; 33(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 26711957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of sign language interpreting services by medical staff in Dundee.
    Martin SE; Irwin J
    Health Bull (Edinb); 2000 May; 58(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 12813823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Email communication in a developing country: different family physician and patient perspectives.
    Makarem NN; Antoun J
    Libyan J Med; 2016; 11():32679. PubMed ID: 27855773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.