122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15808065)
1. [Artificial disc replacement promises the end of spinal fusion technology].
Tian W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):9. PubMed ID: 15808065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The relation of artificial intervertebral disc replacement and spondylodesis].
Wang P
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 15808066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Fusion or replacement: reevaluation of the bone grafting and fusion of the cervical vertebrae].
Yuan W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 15808067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
Lehman RA; Lenke LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery.
Huang RC; Girardi FP; Lim MR; Cammisa FP
Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 15950686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New disc bests fusion.
Duke Med Health News; 2007 Jan; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 17299891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The role of artificial disc replacement in restoring lumbar segment motion and intervertebral height].
Liu SL; Huang DS; Liang AJ; Ye W; Li CH; Ma RF
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jan; 85(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 15808075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New artificial spinal disc has a learning curve, payment issues.
Mathias JM
OR Manager; 2005 Jan; 21(1):1, 16-8. PubMed ID: 15707141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The artificial intervertebral disk.
Guinn NJ
Todays OR Nurse; 1994; 16(4):14-6. PubMed ID: 8066586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
Denozière G; Ku DN
J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spine-tingling prospects. Artificial disc implants are among the new technologies expected to revolutionize the outcomes of back surgery.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Nov; 33(45):30-2. PubMed ID: 14666550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Replacement of lumbosacral intervertebral disks using artificial prostheses: surgical tactics and technique].
Konovalov NA; Shevelev IN; Kungurtsev VV; Zelenkov PV; Nazarenko AG
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2008; (3):25-30; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 19062592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions.
Panjabi M; Malcolmson G; Teng E; Tominaga Y; Henderson G; Serhan H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):959-66; discussion 967. PubMed ID: 17450069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
