177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15808256)
1. Effect of microkeratome suction during LASIK on ocular structures.
Mirshahi A; Kohnen T
Ophthalmology; 2005 Apr; 112(4):645-9. PubMed ID: 15808256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ocular structure changes during vacuum by the Hansatome microkeratome suction ring.
Davis RM; Evangelista JA
J Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 23(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 17598574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occurrence of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: Ultrasound evaluation.
Gavrilov JC; Gaujoux T; Sellam M; Laroche L; Borderie V
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Jul; 37(7):1300-4. PubMed ID: 21549559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond laser and microkeratome-assisted lase in situ keratomileusis].
Wang TT; Wang Y; Zhao SZ
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 49(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 23900089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of posterior vitreous detachment after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Mirshahi A; Schöpfer D; Gerhardt D; Terzi E; Kasper T; Kohnen T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 244(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 16044328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of Posterior Vitreous Detachment After Femtosecond LASIK Compared With Microkeratome LASIK.
Osman MH; Khalil NM; El-Agha MS
Cornea; 2017 Sep; 36(9):1036-1039. PubMed ID: 28708815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vitreoretinal alterations following laser in situ keratomileusis: clinical and experimental studies.
Luna JD; Artal MN; Reviglio VE; Pelizzari M; Diaz H; Juarez CP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Jul; 239(6):416-23. PubMed ID: 11561789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness using the Hansatome microkeratome with zero compression heads.
Taneri S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 16516782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors predictive of LASIK flap thickness with the Hansatome zero compression microkeratome.
Choudhri SA; Feigenbaum SK; Pepose JS
J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 15977882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complete bilateral vitreous detachment after LASIK retreatment.
Smith RJ; Yadarola MB; Pelizzari MF; Luna JD; Juárez CP; Reviglio VE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1382-4. PubMed ID: 15177623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of posterior vitreous detachment after cataract surgery.
Mirshahi A; Höhn F; Lorenz K; Hattenbach LO
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 19465281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Incidence of vitreoretinal pathologic conditions in myopic eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis].
Lin J; Xie X; Du X; Yang Y; Yao K
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Sep; 38(9):546-9. PubMed ID: 12410975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flap-induced astigmatism in eyes with sphere myopia correction: Superior hinge using a rotating microkeratome versus nasal hinge using a linear microkeratome.
Katz T; Frings A; Richard G; Steinberg J; Druchkiv V; Linke SJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1160-7. PubMed ID: 26189377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed mechanism for retinal tears after LASIK: an experimental model.
Flaxel CJ; Choi YH; Sheety M; Oeinck SC; Lee JY; McDonnell PJ
Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 14711709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No forward shifting of posterior corneal surface in eyes undergoing LASIK.
Nishimura R; Negishi K; Saiki M; Arai H; Shimizu S; Toda I; Tsubota K
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1104-10. PubMed ID: 17239440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kezirian GM; Stonecipher KG
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 15093642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Study on the posterior vitreous detachment in patients with high myopia].
Ye J; Zhou C; Du H; Jiang R; Min H
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1999 Dec; 21(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 12567496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
