857 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15808969)
1. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
Wong WY; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transient brain responses predict the temporal dynamics of sound detection in humans.
Mäkinen V; May P; Tiitinen H
Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):701-6. PubMed ID: 14980572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
Ishida IM; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation steps.
Lüddemann H; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):39-57. PubMed ID: 19555753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.
Morita T; Fujiki N; Nagamine T; Hiraumi H; Naito Y; Shibasaki H; Ito J
Brain Res; 2006 May; 1087(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 16626668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human auditory steady state responses to binaural and monaural beats.
Schwarz DW; Taylor P
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):658-68. PubMed ID: 15721080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.
Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Nakagawa S
Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1709-13. PubMed ID: 18841088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.
Johnson BW; Hautus MJ
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2610-9. PubMed ID: 20466010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing.
Anourova I; Nikouline VV; Ilmoniemi RJ; Hotta J; Aronen HJ; Carlson S
Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1268-77. PubMed ID: 11707083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of amplitude modulation of background noise on auditory-evoked magnetic fields.
Hiraumi H; Nagamine T; Morita T; Naito Y; Fukuyama H; Ito J
Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():191-7. PubMed ID: 18778694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Latency variation of auditory N1m responses to vocal and nonvocal sounds.
Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamasoba T
Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1945-9. PubMed ID: 18007192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields.
Kawase T; Maki A; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Sato M; Kobayashi T
Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1037-42. PubMed ID: 21945467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
