324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15809231)
1. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.
Salisbury C; Macleod J; Egger M; McCarthy A; Patel R; Holloway A; Ibrahim F; Sterne JA; Horner P; Low N
Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Feb; 56(523):99-103. PubMed ID: 16464322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.
Low N; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Salisbury C; Campbell R; Roberts TE; Horner P; Skidmore S; Sterne JA; Sanford E; Ibrahim F; Holloway A; Patel R; Barton PM; Robinson SM; Mills N; Graham A; Herring A; Caul EO; Davey Smith G; Hobbs FD; Ross JD; Egger M;
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. PubMed ID: 17311735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening?
Macleod J; Rowsell R; Horner P; Crowley T; Caul EO; Low N; Smith GD
Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Jun; 49(443):455-8. PubMed ID: 10562745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of chlamydia screening in a general practice setting: a 6-month pilot study.
Harris DI
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2005 Apr; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15921545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a systematic postal screening and treatment service for genital Chlamydia trachomatis, with remote clinic access via the internet: a cross-sectional study, East of England.
Bracebridge S; Bachmann MO; Ramkhelawon K; Woolnough A
Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Aug; 88(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 22375045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London.
Pierpoint T; Thomas B; Judd A; Brugha R; Taylor-Robinson D; Renton A
Sex Transm Infect; 2000 Aug; 76(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 11026882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chlamydia trachomatis testing in the second British national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles: respondent uptake and treatment outcomes.
McCadden A; Fenton KA; McManus S; Mercer CH; Erens B; Carder C; Ridgway G; Macdowall W; Nanchahal K; Byron CL; Copas A; Wellings K; Johnson AM
Sex Transm Dis; 2005 Jun; 32(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 15912087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].
van Valkengoed IG; Boeke AJ; van den Brule AJ; Morré SA; Dekker JH; Meijer CJ; van Eijk JT
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):672-6. PubMed ID: 10321300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simplifying chlamydia testing: an innovative Chlamydia trachomatis testing approach using the internet and a home sampling strategy: population based study.
Novak DP; Karlsson RB
Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Apr; 82(2):142-7; discussion 152-3. PubMed ID: 16581742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.
Senok A; Wilson P; Reid M; Scoular A; Craig N; McConnachie A; Fitzpatrick B; MacDonald A
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15709078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Fenton KA; Korovessis C; Johnson AM; McCadden A; McManus S; Wellings K; Mercer CH; Carder C; Copas AJ; Nanchahal K; Macdowall W; Ridgway G; Field J; Erens B
Lancet; 2001 Dec; 358(9296):1851-4. PubMed ID: 11741624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male undergraduates: a postal survey.
Rogstad KE; Bates SM; Partridge S; Kudesia G; Poll R; Osborne MA; Dixon S
Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Apr; 77(2):111-3. PubMed ID: 11287689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey.
Grun L; Tassano-Smith J; Carder C; Johnson AM; Robinson A; Murray E; Stephenson J; Haines A; Copas A; Ridgway G
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):226-30. PubMed ID: 9253271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling the effectiveness of chlamydia screening in England.
Turner KM; Adams EJ; Lamontagne DS; Emmett L; Baster K; Edmunds WJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2006 Dec; 82(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 17151036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.
Low N; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Salisbury C; Horner PJ; Roberts TE; Campbell R; Herring A; Skidmore S; Sanford E; Sterne JA; Davey Smith G; Graham A; Huengsberg M; Ross J; Egger M
Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 15459400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health insurance coverage, health care-seeking behaviors, and genital chlamydial infection prevalence in sexually active young adults.
Geisler WM; Chyu L; Kusunoki Y; Upchurch DM; Hook EW
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jun; 33(6):389-96. PubMed ID: 16505745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population-based outreach for Chlamydia screening in men: results from a randomized trial.
Scholes D; Heidrich FE; Yarbro P; Lindenbaum JE; Marrazzo JM
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Nov; 34(11):837-9. PubMed ID: 17538514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reinfections, persistent infections, and new infections after general population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the Netherlands.
Veldhuijzen IK; Van Bergen JE; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Morré SA; Richardus JH;
Sex Transm Dis; 2005 Oct; 32(10):599-604. PubMed ID: 16205300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
