These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15809547)

  • 1. Tolerable hearing-aid delays: IV. effects on subjective disturbance during speech production by hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 15809547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tolerable hearing aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 12677113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tolerable hearing aid delays. I. Estimation of limits imposed by the auditory path alone using simulated hearing losses.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 10386846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tolerable hearing aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production.
    Stone MA; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):325-38. PubMed ID: 12195175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tolerable hearing aid delays. V. Estimation of limits for open canal fittings.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Meisenbacher K; Derleth RP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):601-17. PubMed ID: 18469715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tolerable delay for speech production and perception: effects of hearing ability and experience with hearing aids.
    Goehring T; Chapman JL; Bleeck S; Monaghan JJM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 28838277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: aided speech perception measures.
    Jenstad LM; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE; Shantz J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 10229513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of single-channel phonemic compression schemes on the understanding of speech by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Goedegebure A; Hulshof M; Maas RJ; Dreschler WA; Verschuure H
    Audiology; 2001; 40(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 11296937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disturbance caused by varying propagation delay in non-occluding hearing aid fittings.
    Groth J; Søndergaard MB
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(10):594-9. PubMed ID: 15724524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
    Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.