These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15810163)

  • 1. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost effectiveness.
    Cohen AM
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):409; author reply 409-11. PubMed ID: 15810163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost effectiveness.
    Ho AM; Joynt GM; Karmakar MK
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):408-9; author reply 409-11. PubMed ID: 15810162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost effectiveness.
    Scott DH
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):407-8; author reply 409-11. PubMed ID: 15766346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness.
    Calvert N; Hind D; McWilliams R; Davidson A; Beverley CA; Thomas SM
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Nov; 59(11):1116-20. PubMed ID: 15479322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Calvert N; Hind D; McWilliams RG; Thomas SM; Beverley C; Davidson A
    Health Technol Assess; 2003; 7(12):1-84. PubMed ID: 12709290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New guidance criteria for central venous catheters.
    Schad CA
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 15259688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of clinical and economic performance of peripheral venous catheters].
    Surov AV; Zyrianov SK
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2012; (9):82-6. PubMed ID: 23222988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Not NICE advice.
    White SM;
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Mar; 58(3):295-6. PubMed ID: 12603481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based decision making in ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation: choosing between the eye and the ear.
    Augoustides JG
    J Clin Anesth; 2006 May; 18(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 16731316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral venous cutdown.
    Chappell S; Vilke GM; Chan TC; Harrigan RA; Ufberg JW
    J Emerg Med; 2006 Nov; 31(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 17046484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Open localization technique for percutaneous insertion of central venous access devices.
    Deshpande RK; Qureshi SS
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Jul; 96(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 17567841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PICC innovation leads to improved health services.
    Robinson-Reilly M; Fletcher T
    Aust Nurs J; 2006 Sep; 14(3):29. PubMed ID: 16989389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients.
    Karakitsos D; Labropoulos N; De Groot E; Patrianakos AP; Kouraklis G; Poularas J; Samonis G; Tsoutsos DA; Konstadoulakis MM; Karabinis A
    Crit Care; 2006; 10(6):R162. PubMed ID: 17112371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guidewire assisted cephalic vein cutdown for insertion of totally implantable access ports.
    Chang HM; Hsieh HF; Hsu SD; Liao GS; Lin CH; Hsieh CB; Yu JC
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 95(2):156-7. PubMed ID: 17262733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement.
    Karakousis CP
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb; 95(2):180-1. PubMed ID: 17262728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [How to improve central venous catheter use in intensive care unit?].
    Merrer J; Lefrant JY; Timsit JF
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2006 Feb; 25(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 16226862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there a real advantage in utilizing central venous ports in oncology surgery? An analysis of the cost-effectiveness ratio.
    Biffi R; Pozzi S; Pace U; Cenciarelli S; Zambelli M; Orsi F; Grasso RF; De Braud F; Andreoni B
    Tumori; 2001; 87(4):S74-5. PubMed ID: 11693831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of saline infusion instead of gel for ultrasound-guided (USG) central venous cannulation.
    Sinha R; Punj J; Pandey R
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2008 May; 52(5):721. PubMed ID: 18419733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasonography in percutaneous liver biopsy.
    Smith CI
    Hepatology; 1999 Feb; 29(2):610. PubMed ID: 10026028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous cephalic vein cannulation (in the Deltopectoral Groove), with ultrasound guidance.
    LeDonne J
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 May; 200(5):810-1. PubMed ID: 15848377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.