These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15810712)

  • 1. [Complementary examinations].
    Huguier M
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2005; 100(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 15810712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Basic principles of diagnostic evaluation].
    Cohen J; Dubos F; Bossuyt P; Chalumeau M; Levy C; Martinot A
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):186-7. PubMed ID: 26112584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good interpretation of the results of a diagnostic test.
    Veziris N; Jarlier V
    Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Oct; 37(8):1143; author reply 1143-4. PubMed ID: 14523783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Using characteristic numbers to estimate the usefulness of laboratory tests for diagnosis].
    Uhari M
    Duodecim; 2004; 120(8):935-41. PubMed ID: 15185506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Salmi LR; Michel P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 15485744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Epidemiology and scientific methodology applied to pediatrics (IV): diagnostic tests].
    Ochoa Sangrador C; Orejas G
    An Esp Pediatr; 1999 Mar; 50(3):301-14. PubMed ID: 10334058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The STARD initiative: a possible link to diagnostic accuracy and reduction in medical error.
    McQueen MJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):307-8. PubMed ID: 12880531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reference values in medicine and validity of diagnostic test.
    Indrayan A; Satyanarayana L
    Indian Pediatr; 2000 Mar; 37(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 10750070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.
    O'Connor A; Evans RB
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 17466752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. McNemar chi2 test revisited: comparing sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic examinations.
    Trajman A; Luiz RR
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2008; 68(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 18224558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostics: new methodological initiatives].
    Magid E; Jørgensen PE; Jørgensen LG; Madsen JS; Larsen TB; Hilden J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1664-6. PubMed ID: 15174402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Various randomized designs can be used to evaluate medical tests.
    Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18945590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teaching information mastery: the case of baby Jeff and the importance of Bayes' theorem.
    Slawson DC; Shaughnessy AF
    Fam Med; 2002 Feb; 34(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 11874025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of accuracy of diagnostic modalities for evaluation of breast cancer with review of literature.
    Bukhari MH; Akhtar ZM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jun; 37(6):416-24. PubMed ID: 19217034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary: black and white or shades of grey?
    Battaglia M; Pewsner D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 32(2):314-5. PubMed ID: 12714555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
    Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.