312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15811245)
1. Separation of the systems for color and spatial manipulation in working memory revealed by a dual-task procedure.
Mohr HM; Linden DE
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):355-66. PubMed ID: 15811245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
Vergauwe E; Barrouillet P; Camos V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1012-28. PubMed ID: 19586267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A facilitative effect of negative affective valence on working memory.
Gotoh F; Kikuchi T; Olofsson U
Scand J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 51(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 20132459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory.
Klauer KC; Zhao Z
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):355-81. PubMed ID: 15355144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial working memory and spatial attention rely on common neural processes in the intraparietal sulcus.
Silk TJ; Bellgrove MA; Wrafter P; Mattingley JB; Cunnington R
Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):718-24. PubMed ID: 20615473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lateralized contribution of prefrontal cortex in controlling task-irrelevant information during verbal and spatial working memory tasks: rTMS evidence.
Sandrini M; Rossini PM; Miniussi C
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2056-63. PubMed ID: 18336847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the effect of verbal working memory load on visuo-spatial exogenous orienting.
Santangelo V; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 413(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 17174028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task.
Jolicoeur P; Brisson B; Robitaille N
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():160-72. PubMed ID: 18482718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces.
Gonzalez-Garrido AA; Ramos-Loyo J; Gomez-Velazquez FR; Alvelais Alarcón M; Moises de la Serna Tuya J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 17555835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequential neural processes of tactile-visual crossmodal working memory.
Ohara S; Lenz F; Zhou YD
Neuroscience; 2006 Apr; 139(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16324794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources.
Siu KC; Woollacott MH
Gait Posture; 2007 Jan; 25(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 16554158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional cueing reverses deficits in spatial working memory task performance in chronic low dose MPTP-treated monkeys.
Decamp E; Tinker JP; Schneider JS
Behav Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 152(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 15196793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: an fMRI study.
Zago L; Petit L; Turbelin MR; Andersson F; Vigneau M; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2403-14. PubMed ID: 18406434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task.
van Dijck JP; Gevers W; Fias W
Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 19726035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mental rotation impairs attention shifting and short-term memory encoding: neurophysiological evidence against the response-selection bottleneck model of dual-task performance.
Pannebakker MM; Jolicœur P; van Dam WO; Band GP; Ridderinkhof KR; Hommel B
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Sep; 49(11):2985-93. PubMed ID: 21736889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased neural efficiency with repeated performance of a working memory task is information-type dependent.
Sayala S; Sala JB; Courtney SM
Cereb Cortex; 2006 May; 16(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 16079245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.
Makovski T; Shim WM; Jiang YV
J Vis; 2006 Dec; 6(12):1459-70. PubMed ID: 17209748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
