These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15811698)

  • 21. Middle-latency auditory-evoked magnetic fields in patients with auditory cortex lesions.
    Kaga K; Kurauchi T; Yumoto M; Uno A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 15224857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Auditory evoked magnetic fields in patients of pure word deafness].
    Makino M; Takanashi Y; Iwamoto K; Yoshikawa K; Ohshima H; Nakajima K; Hayashi K; Hayashi R; Endo K
    No To Shinkei; 1998 Jan; 50(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 9493199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Noise-induced increase in human auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Alain C; Quan J; McDonald K; Van Roon P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 19558607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. One set of sounds, two tonotopic maps: exploring auditory cortex with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Weisz N; Keil A; Wienbruch C; Hoffmeister S; Elbert T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jun; 115(6):1249-58. PubMed ID: 15134691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Middle latency auditory-evoked fields reflect psychoacoustic gap detection thresholds in human listeners.
    Rupp A; Gutschalk A; Uppenkamp S; Scherg M
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Oct; 92(4):2239-47. PubMed ID: 15381743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of pitch and pitch strength on an auditory-evoked N1m.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2008 May; 19(7):783-7. PubMed ID: 18418257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurements of auditory and somatically evoked magnetic fields and localization of their dipole sources.
    Kuriki S; Isobe Y; Mizutani Y
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1989; 1(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 2486751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory temporal resolution in children assessed by magnetoencephalography.
    Diedler J; Pietz J; Bast T; Rupp A
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1691-5. PubMed ID: 17921870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques.
    Palomäki KJ; Tiitinen H; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):364-79. PubMed ID: 16099350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Priority of repetitive adaptation to mismatch response following undiscriminable auditory stimulation: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Hoshiyama M; Okamoto H; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 25(3):854-62. PubMed ID: 17328780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A novel type of auditory responses: temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization.
    Ross B
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1265-77. PubMed ID: 18632891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequency specific impairment of automatic pitch change detection by fMRI acoustic noise: an MEG study.
    Novitski N; Maess B; Tervaniemi M
    J Neurosci Methods; 2006 Jul; 155(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 16530843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neuromagnetic mismatch field (MMF) dependence on the auditory temporal integration window and the existence of categorical boundaries: comparisons between dissyllabic words and their equivalent tones.
    Inouchi M; Kubota M; Ohta K; Matsushima E; Ferrari P; Scovel T
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1232():155-62. PubMed ID: 18671951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence of vibrotactile input to human auditory cortex.
    Caetano G; Jousmäki V
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16168673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory evoked field at threshold.
    Lütkenhöner B; Klein JS
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):188-200. PubMed ID: 17434696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children.
    Fujioka T; Ross B; Kakigi R; Pantev C; Trainor LJ
    Brain; 2006 Oct; 129(Pt 10):2593-608. PubMed ID: 16959812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acute tryptophan depletion decreases intensity dependence of auditory evoked magnetic N1/P2 dipole source activity.
    Kähkönen S; Jääskeläinen IP; Pennanen S; Liesivuori J; Ahveninen J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Nov; 164(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 12404086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.