135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15811699)
1. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing.
Zeng FG; Shannon RV
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():235-8. PubMed ID: 7668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of spatial and temporal separation.
McKay CM; McDermott HJ; Clark GM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():230-3. PubMed ID: 7668649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant.
House WF; Edgerton BJ
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):104-16. PubMed ID: 6805389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA
Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
Bierer JA; Nye AD
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
Pfingst BE; Franck KH; Xu L; Bauer EM; Zwolan TA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 2(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 11550528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.
Hochmair I; Arnold W; Nopp P; Jolly C; Müller J; Roland P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jun; 123(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 12875584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.
Shannon RV
Hear Res; 1985 May; 18(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3840159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single electrode maps in device troubleshooting.
Hodges AV; Balkany TJ; Schloffman JJ
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S115. PubMed ID: 9391624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Changes in the hearing and discomfort thresholds in patients with the Clark/nucleus inner ear prosthesis].
Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E; Laszig R
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Aug; 67(8):412-5. PubMed ID: 3210875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two loudness balancing tasks in cochlear implant subjects using bipolar stimulation.
Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):439-48. PubMed ID: 11605951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
