These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15811706)

  • 1. Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.
    Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15811706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of temporal properties on compound action potentials in response to amplitude-modulated electric pulse trains in guinea pigs.
    Jeng FC; Abbas PJ; Hu N; Miller CA; Nourski KV; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 19015019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
    Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 232(1-2):87-103. PubMed ID: 17723284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recovery characteristics of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve in deafened guinea pigs: relation to neuronal status.
    Ramekers D; Versnel H; Strahl SB; Klis SF; Grolman W
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():12-24. PubMed ID: 25582354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
    Runge-Samuelson CL; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Robinson BK
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A; Psarros C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus level effects on neural excitation and eCAP amplitude.
    Westen AA; Dekker DM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):166-76. PubMed ID: 21664959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of intravenous injection of aspirin on the cochlea].
    Kumagai M
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 67(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 1597302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The combined effects of forward masking by noise and high click rate on monaural and binaural human auditory nerve and brainstem potentials.
    Pratt H; Polyakov A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 15219323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Laurello SA
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():116-129. PubMed ID: 28633960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of the Adaptation Recovery Function of the Auditory Nerve and Its Association With Advanced Age in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1472-1486. PubMed ID: 35139051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Morsnowski A; Charasse B; Collet L; Killian M; Müller-Deile J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facilitation and refractoriness of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Hey M; Müller-Deile J; Hessel H; Killian M
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():14-22. PubMed ID: 28947082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Matching the neural adaptation in the rat ventral cochlear nucleus produced by artificial (electric) and acoustic stimulation of the cochlea.
    Loquet G; Pelizzone M; Valentini G; Rouiller EM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(3):144-59. PubMed ID: 15084819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
    Xu Y; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.