These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15811706)

  • 21. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 19068227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.
    Hu N; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC; Abkes BA; Nichols JM
    Hear Res; 2003 Nov; 185(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 14599695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting the threshold of pulse-train electrical stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
    Xu Y; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Apr; 51(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 15072213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatial overlap of combined electroacoustic stimulation determines the electrically evoked response in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Stronks HC; Prijs VF; Chimona TS; Grolman W; Klis SF
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1535-42. PubMed ID: 23099336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Zhang F; Jeng FC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):425-45. PubMed ID: 19205803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model.
    Xu Y; Collins LM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1389-98. PubMed ID: 17694859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A study of damaged acoustic biopotentials in guinea pigs following exposure to white noise].
    Beck C; Benning CD; Stange G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 79(3-4):297-303. PubMed ID: 806217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    He S; Abbas PJ; Doyle DV; McFayden TC; Mulherin S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):397-411. PubMed ID: 26655913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Rubinstein JT
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrode independence in intraneural cochlear nerve stimulation.
    Badi AN; Owa AO; Shelton C; Normann RA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17195741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
    Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.
    Kirby AE; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 103(1):531-42. PubMed ID: 19923242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system.
    Miller CA; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Chi SL
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):184-97. PubMed ID: 18515023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of neural refractoriness on spatio-temporal variability in spike initiations with Electrical stimulation.
    Mino H; Rubinstein JT
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 17009486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.
    Adel Y; Hilkhuysen G; Noreña A; Cazals Y; Roman S; Macherey O
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):495-512. PubMed ID: 28224320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Electrophysiologic studies on the course of the adaptation phase following noise stress].
    von Wedel H; Dum N; Walger M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1985 Aug; 64(8):436-40. PubMed ID: 4046695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.