These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15812171)

  • 1. Case-control association studies in mixed populations: correcting using genomic control.
    Shmulewitz D; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):145-53. PubMed ID: 15812171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critical evaluation of genomic control methods for genetic association studies.
    Dadd T; Weale ME; Lewis CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 May; 33(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 19051284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. I. Elevation in false positive rates and comparison to confounding risk ratios (a simulation study).
    Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Gorroochurn P; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Case-control association tests correcting for population stratification.
    Köhler K; Bickeböller H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 70(Pt 1):98-115. PubMed ID: 16441260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Wang K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 19235185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust genomic control and robust delta centralization tests for case-control association studies.
    Zang Y; Zhang H; Yang Y; Zheng G
    Hum Hered; 2007; 63(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17310128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic control for association studies under various genetic models.
    Zheng G; Freidlin B; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):186-92. PubMed ID: 15737092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of assortative mating upon genetic association studies: spurious associations and population substructure in the absence of admixture.
    Redden DT; Allison DB
    Behav Genet; 2006 Sep; 36(5):678-86. PubMed ID: 16514473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting association in a case-control study while correcting for population stratification.
    Reich DE; Goldstein DB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 11119293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculations for population- and family-based case-control association studies on marker genotypes.
    Pfeiffer RM; Gail MH
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Sep; 25(2):136-48. PubMed ID: 12916022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case-control studies of association in structured or admixed populations.
    Pritchard JK; Donnelly P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 11855957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Centralizing the non-central chi-square: A new method to correct for population stratification in genetic case-control association studies.
    Gorroochurn P; Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):277-89. PubMed ID: 16502404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CAPL: a novel association test using case-control and family data and accounting for population stratification.
    Chung RH; Schmidt MA; Morris RW; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 34(7):747-55. PubMed ID: 20878716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of artificial neural network analysis with other multimarker methods for detecting genetic association.
    Curtis D
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():49. PubMed ID: 17640352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixed model reduces spurious genetic associations produced by population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Shin J; Lee C
    Genomics; 2015 Apr; 105(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 25640449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the impact of population stratification on genetic association studies.
    Freedman ML; Reich D; Penney KL; McDonald GJ; Mignault AA; Patterson N; Gabriel SB; Topol EJ; Smoller JW; Pato CN; Pato MT; Petryshen TL; Kolonel LN; Lander ES; Sklar P; Henderson B; Hirschhorn JN; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2004 Apr; 36(4):388-93. PubMed ID: 15052270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association mapping, using a mixture model for complex traits.
    Zhu X; Zhang S; Zhao H; Cooper RS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Aug; 23(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 12214310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.