232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15812621)
1. [The influence of the C-leg knee-shin system from the Otto Bock Company in the care of above-knee amputees. A clinical-biomechanical study to define indications].
Wetz HH; Hafkemeyer U; Drerup B
Orthopade; 2005 Apr; 34(4):298, 300-314, 316-9. PubMed ID: 15812621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obstacle course: users' maneuverability and movement efficiency when using Otto Bock C-Leg, Otto Bock 3R60, and CaTech SNS prosthetic knee joints.
Meier MR; Hansen AH; Gard SA; McFadyen AK
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):583-96. PubMed ID: 22773261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees.
Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Klute GK; McDowell ML; Pecoraro JA; Shofer J; Czerniecki JM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(7):857-70. PubMed ID: 17436172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review.
Mileusnic MP; Rettinger L; Highsmith MJ; Hahn A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 31469023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional added value of microprocessor-controlled knee joints in daily life performance of Medicare Functional Classification Level-2 amputees.
Theeven P; Hemmen B; Rings F; Meys G; Brink P; Smeets R; Seelen H
J Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 43(10):906-15. PubMed ID: 21947182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kinematics in the terminal swing phase of unilateral transfemoral amputees: microprocessor-controlled versus swing-phase control prosthetic knees.
Mâaref K; Martinet N; Grumillier C; Ghannouchi S; André JM; Paysant J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jun; 91(6):919-25. PubMed ID: 20510984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gait asymmetry of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Frittoli S; Frigo CA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jun; 27(5):460-5. PubMed ID: 22221344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and function of a prototype microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis for low active transfemoral amputees switching from a mechanic knee prosthesis: a pilot study.
Hasenoehrl T; Schmalz T; Windhager R; Domayer S; Dana S; Ambrozy C; Palma S; Crevenna R
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 28399722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking?
Williams RM; Turner AP; Orendurff M; Segal AD; Klute GK; Pecoraro J; Czerniecki J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 16813788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complementary limb motion estimation for the control of active knee prostheses.
Vallery H; Burgkart R; Hartmann C; Mitternacht J; Riener R; Buss M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2011 Feb; 56(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21303189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gait Analysis of Transfemoral Amputees: Errors in Inverse Dynamics Are Substantial and Depend on Prosthetic Design.
Dumas R; Branemark R; Frossard L
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jun; 25(6):679-685. PubMed ID: 28113632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Levine JA; Brey RH; Iverson BK; McCrady SK; Padgett DJ; Joyner MJ
Gait Posture; 2007 Oct; 26(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 17869114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy cost during ambulation in transfemoral amputees: a knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control.
Boonstra AM; Schrama J; Fidler V; Eisma WH
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1995 Jun; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 7569824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of prosthetic ankle mobility in the sagittal plane on the gait of transfemoral amputees wearing a stance phase controlled knee prosthesis.
Lee S; Hong J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Feb; 223(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19278201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stair ascent with an innovative microprocessor-controlled exoprosthetic knee joint.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Ludwigs E; Blumentritt S
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Dec; 57(6):435-44. PubMed ID: 23241569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crossover study of amputee stair ascent and descent biomechanics using Genium and C-Leg prostheses with comparison to non-amputee control.
Lura DJ; Wernke MW; Carey SL; Kahle JT; Miro RM; Highsmith MJ
Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():103-107. PubMed ID: 28763712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
