234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15812621)
21. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Gait termination on a declined surface in trans-femoral amputees: Impact of using microprocessor-controlled limb system.
Abdulhasan ZM; Scally AJ; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():35-41. PubMed ID: 29908391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance Evaluation of Jaipur Knee Joint through Kinematics and Kinetics Gait Symmetry with Unilateral Transfemoral Indian Amputees.
Mishra P; Singh S; Ranjan V; Singh S; Vidyarthi A
J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(3):55. PubMed ID: 30694396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices.
Johansson JL; Sherrill DM; Riley PO; Bonato P; Herr H
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Aug; 84(8):563-75. PubMed ID: 16034225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reference values for gait temporal and loading symmetry of lower-limb amputees can help in refocusing rehabilitation targets.
Cutti AG; Verni G; Migliore GL; Amoresano A; Raggi M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):61. PubMed ID: 30255808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Biomechanics and evaluation of the microprocessor-controlled C-Leg exoprosthesis knee joint].
Stinus H
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 10929622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mobility function of a prosthetic knee joint with an automatic stance phase lock.
Andrysek J; Klejman S; Torres-Moreno R; Heim W; Steinnagel B; Glasford S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 21697198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimisation of the prescription for trans-tibial (TT) amputees.
Cortés A; Viosca E; Hoyos JV; Prat J; Sánchez-Lacuesta J
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 9453087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Effects of the Inertial Properties of Above-Knee Prostheses on Optimal Stiffness, Damping, and Engagement Parameters of Passive Prosthetic Knees.
Narang YS; Murthy Arelekatti VN; Winter AG
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27429248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Design and quantitative evaluation of a stance-phase controlled prosthetic knee joint for children.
Andrysek J; Naumann S; Cleghorn WL
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 16425824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Compensatory mechanism involving the hip joint of the intact limb during gait in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.
Grumillier C; Martinet N; Paysant J; André JM; Beyaert C
J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2926-31. PubMed ID: 18771768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An automatic hinge system for leg orthoses.
Rietman JS; Goudsmit J; Meulemans D; Halbertsma JP; Geertzen JH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Apr; 28(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15171581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee on planned gait termination.
Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Koopman BF; Rietman JS
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1254-1259. PubMed ID: 28813993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Gait analysis of transfemoral amputee patients using prostheses with two different knee joints.
Boonstra AM; Schrama JM; Eisma WH; Hof AL; Fidler V
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 May; 77(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 8629932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Swing Phase Control of Semi-Active Prosthetic Knee Using Neural Network Predictive Control With Particle Swarm Optimization.
Ekkachai K; Nilkhamhang I
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Nov; 24(11):1169-1178. PubMed ID: 26829798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improving the gait performance of non-fluid-based swing-phase control mechanisms in transfemoral prostheses.
Furse A; Cleghorn W; Andrysek J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Aug; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 21592917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new modular six-bar linkage trans-femoral prosthesis for walking and squatting.
Chakraborty JK; Patil KM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 7991367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 1: Biomechanical analysis related to user benefits.
Postema K; Hermens HJ; de Vries J; Koopman HF; Eisma WH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Apr; 21(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 9141122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance assessment of the Terry Fox jogging prosthesis for above-knee amputees.
DiAngelo DJ; Winter DA; Ghista DN; Newcombe WR
J Biomech; 1989; 22(6-7):543-58. PubMed ID: 2808440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using C-Leg and Power Knee for ascending and descending inclines and steps.
Wolf EJ; Everding VQ; Linberg AL; Schnall BL; Czerniecki JM; Gambel JM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(6):831-42. PubMed ID: 23299255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
