These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15812970)

  • 1. Beneficence, determinism and justice: an engagement with the argument for the genetic selection of intelligence.
    Birch K
    Bioethics; 2005 Feb; 19(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 15812970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wrongs, preferences, and the selection of children: a critique of Rebecca Bennett's argument against the principle of procreative beneficence.
    Herissone-Kelly P
    Bioethics; 2012 Oct; 26(8):447-54. PubMed ID: 21320140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.
    Savulescu J
    Bioethics; 2001 Oct; 15(5-6):413-26. PubMed ID: 12058767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First, do no harm: Generalized procreative non-maleficence.
    Saunders B
    Bioethics; 2017 Sep; 31(7):552-558. PubMed ID: 28786178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The post-humanist embryo: genetic manipulation, assisted reproductive technologies and the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
    Güell Pelayo F
    Cuad Bioet; 2014; 25(85):427-43. PubMed ID: 25684382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The proper scope of the principle of procreative beneficence revisited.
    Holm S; Bennett R
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2014; 32(1-2):22-32. PubMed ID: 25434062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioural genetics: why eugenic selection is preferable to enhancement.
    Savulescu J; Hemsley M; Newson A; Foddy B
    J Appl Philos; 2006; 23(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 17036429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Failures of Imagination: Disability and the Ethics of Selective Reproduction.
    Soniewicka M
    Bioethics; 2015 Oct; 29(8):557-63. PubMed ID: 25689344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The principle of procreative beneficence and its implications for genetic engineering.
    Gantsho L
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2022 Dec; 43(5-6):307-328. PubMed ID: 35882747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the partiality of procreative beneficence: a critical note.
    Petersen TS
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 41(9):771-4. PubMed ID: 25907895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On our obligation to select the best children: a reply to Savulescu.
    de Melo-Martin I
    Bioethics; 2004; 18(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 15168699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When intuition is not enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence must work much harder to justify its eugenic vision.
    Bennett R
    Bioethics; 2014 Nov; 28(9):447-55. PubMed ID: 23841936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetics and human behaviour: the ethical context--summary and recommendations.
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics
    J Int Bioethique; 2003; 14(3-4):171-92. PubMed ID: 15281207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why we are not morally required to select the best children: a response to Savulescu.
    Stoller SE
    Bioethics; 2008 Aug; 22(7):364-9. PubMed ID: 18445092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Case Against the Case for Procreative Beneficence (PB).
    Holland A
    Bioethics; 2016 Sep; 30(7):490-9. PubMed ID: 27000681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasons, rationalities, and procreative beneficence: need Häyry stand politely by while Savulescu and Herissone-Kelly disagree?
    Herissone-Kelly P
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Apr; 20(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 21435300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procreative beneficence: cui bono?
    Elster J
    Bioethics; 2011 Nov; 25(9):482-8. PubMed ID: 20047587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why genetic testing for genes for criminality is morally required.
    Savulescu J
    Princet J Bioeth; 2001; 4():79-97. PubMed ID: 12166468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The principle of procreative beneficence: old arguments and a new challenge.
    Hotke A
    Bioethics; 2014 Jun; 28(5):255-62. PubMed ID: 22845855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The best possible child.
    Parker M
    J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 17470505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.