These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15813195)
1. Location cuing and response time distributions in visual attention. Gottlob LR Percept Psychophys; 2004 Nov; 66(8):1293-302. PubMed ID: 15813195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attention relieves visual crowding: Dissociable effects of peripheral and central cues. Gong M; Liu T; Liu X; Huangfu B; Geng F J Vis; 2023 May; 23(5):9. PubMed ID: 37163245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection? Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Berlucchi G Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 8116277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention. Chen X; Chen Q; Gao D; Yue Z Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 22670628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Logan GD; Bundesen C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Jun; 29(3):575-99. PubMed ID: 12848327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onset and offset cues. Pratt J; Hirshhorn M Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 14634813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing. Schendel KL; Robertson LC; Treisman A Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):577-94. PubMed ID: 11436731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention. Roberts KL; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the spatial metric of short-SOA costs of exogenous cuing. Chen P; Moore C; Mordkoff JT Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 18510134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Movement versus focusing of visual attention. Shepherd M; Müller HJ Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 2762102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades. Fischer B; Weber H Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 9655226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An examination of attentional control in the auditory modality: further evidence for auditory orienting. Quinlan PT; Bailey PJ Percept Psychophys; 1995 Jul; 57(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 7644322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task. Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture. Burnham BR Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):257-77. PubMed ID: 23151961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic and voluntary control of attention in young and older adults. Juola JF; Koshino H; Warner CB; McMickell M; Peterson M Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(2):159-78. PubMed ID: 10862340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries. Mondor TA; Bryden MP Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Apr; 44(3):529-55. PubMed ID: 1631321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation. Riggio L; Kirsner K Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):885-99. PubMed ID: 9270363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Temporal course of position shift for a peripheral target. Yamada Y; Miura K; Kawabe T J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21562033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]