These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15813490)

  • 1. Frequency of judgment as a context-like determinant of predictive judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Vegas S; Matute H
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1065-75. PubMed ID: 15813490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dilution and confirmation of probability judgments based on nondiagnostic evidence.
    LaBella C; Koehler DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1076-89. PubMed ID: 15813491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the role of causal intervention in multiple-cue judgment: positive and negative effects on learning.
    Enkvist T; Newell B; Juslin P; Olsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):163-79. PubMed ID: 16478348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.
    Matute H; Vegas S; De Marez PJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):714-25. PubMed ID: 12109763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of theory-based feature correlations on typicality judgments.
    Ahn WK; Marsh JK; Luhmann CC; Lee K
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 11958344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring interventional predictions from observational learning data.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 18605483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A common error term regulates acquisition but not extinction of causal judgments in people.
    Griffiths O; Westbrook RF
    Learn Behav; 2012 Jun; 40(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 22201043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When learning order affects sensitivity to base rates: challenges for theories of causal learning.
    Reips UD; Waldmann MR
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 18271349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal judgments about relations between multilevel variables.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):499-513. PubMed ID: 11294446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the Implicit Association Test as a measure of causal learning does not eliminate effects of rule learning.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 20178964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of outcome valence on positive and negative patterning in human causal reasoning.
    Whitlow JW
    Learn Behav; 2010 May; 38(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 20400734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of learning data in causal reasoning about observations and interventions.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 19246341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.