These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15813498)

  • 1. Depth rotation and mirror-image reflection reduce affective preference as well as recognition memory for pictures of novel objects.
    Lawson R
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1170-81. PubMed ID: 15813498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit and explicit memory for novel visual objects: structure and function.
    Schacter DL; Cooper LA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Sep; 19(5):995-1009. PubMed ID: 8409854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects.
    Balas BJ; Sinha P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
    Lawson R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):221-45. PubMed ID: 10504882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.
    Schacter DL; Cooper LA; Delaney SM; Peterson MA; Tharan M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 1826731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating viewpoint costs in mental rotation and object recognition.
    Hayward WG; Zhou G; Gauthier I; Harris IM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):820-5. PubMed ID: 17328379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection.
    Cooper LA; Schacter DL; Ballesteros S; Moore C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jan; 18(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 1532021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory.
    Srinivas K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Jul; 21(4):1019-36. PubMed ID: 7673865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects.
    Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):265-92. PubMed ID: 10504884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M; Kaping D; Bülthoff HH
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 15733202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning sequence of views of three-dimensional objects: the effect of temporal coherence on object memory.
    Liu T
    Perception; 2007; 36(9):1320-33. PubMed ID: 18196699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A; Reid SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):238-55. PubMed ID: 11409102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast and illumination effects on explicit and implicit measures of memory.
    Srinivas K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1123-1135. PubMed ID: 8805818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks.
    Bennett DJ; Vuong QC
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1082-93. PubMed ID: 17355033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?
    Dickinson CA; Intraub H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1251-62. PubMed ID: 19633341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces.
    Hill H; Bruce V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):986-1004. PubMed ID: 8756964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching.
    Lawson R; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Apr; 22(2):395-416. PubMed ID: 8934852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.