These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15814046)

  • 1. Comparison of urine contamination rates using three different methods of collection: clean-catch, cotton wool pad and urine bag.
    Alam MT; Coulter JB; Pacheco J; Correia JB; Ribeiro MG; Coelho MF; Bunn JE
    Ann Trop Paediatr; 2005 Mar; 25(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15814046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    LaRocco MT; Franek J; Leibach EK; Weissfeld AS; Kraft CS; Sautter RL; Baselski V; Rodahl D; Peterson EJ; Cornish NE
    Clin Microbiol Rev; 2016 Jan; 29(1):105-47. PubMed ID: 26598386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in children.
    Karacan C; Erkek N; Senel S; Akin Gunduz S; Catli G; Tavil B
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 20357500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Newcastle urine collection pads suitable as a means of collecting specimens from infants?
    Feasey S
    Paediatr Nurs; 1999 Nov; 11(9):17-21. PubMed ID: 10723377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of sterile bag, clean catch and suprapubic aspiration in the diagnosis of urinary infection in early childhood.
    Hardy JD; Furnell PM; Brumfitt W
    Br J Urol; 1976 Aug; 48(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 963408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method comparison study to assess the reliability of urine collection pads as a means of obtaining urine specimens from non-toilet-trained children for microbiological examination.
    Farrell M; Devine K; Lancaster G; Judd B
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Feb; 37(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 11872109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contamination rates of different urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in young children: an observational cohort study.
    Tosif S; Baker A; Oakley E; Donath S; Babl FE
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2012 Aug; 48(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 22537082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moving from bag to catheter for urine collection in non-toilet-trained children suspected of having urinary tract infection: a paired comparison of urine cultures.
    Etoubleau C; Reveret M; Brouet D; Badier I; Brosset P; Fourcade L; Bahans C; Garnier F; Blanc P; Guigonis V
    J Pediatr; 2009 Jun; 154(6):803-6. PubMed ID: 19375715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clean-catch versus urine collection pads: a prospective trial.
    Lewis J
    Paediatr Nurs; 1998 Feb; 10(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 9538773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pad urine collection for early childhood urinary-tract infection.
    Macfarlane PI; Houghton C; Hughes C
    Lancet; 1999 Aug; 354(9178):571. PubMed ID: 10470710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice of urine collection methods for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in young, febrile infants.
    Schroeder AR; Newman TB; Wasserman RC; Finch SA; Pantell RH
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Oct; 159(10):915-22. PubMed ID: 16203935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative study on bacterial cultures of urine samples obtained by clean-void technique versus urethral catheterization.
    Lau AY; Wong SN; Yip KT; Fong KW; Li SP; Que TL
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Mar; 96(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 17407472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sample collection methods for urine culture and analysis].
    Ochoa Sangrador C; Brezmes Valdivieso MF;
    An Pediatr (Barc); 2007 Nov; 67(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 17991364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To clean or not to clean: effect on contamination rates in midstream urine collections in toilet-trained children.
    Vaillancourt S; McGillivray D; Zhang X; Kramer MS
    Pediatrics; 2007 Jun; 119(6):e1288-93. PubMed ID: 17502345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A midstream urine collector is not a good alternative to a sterile collection method during the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.
    Verliat-Guinaud J; Blanc P; Garnier F; Gajdos V; Guigonis V
    Acta Paediatr; 2015 Sep; 104(9):e395-400. PubMed ID: 25857456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Urine culture from bag specimens in young children: are the risks too high?
    Al-Orifi F; McGillivray D; Tange S; Kramer MS
    J Pediatr; 2000 Aug; 137(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 10931415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A head-to-head comparison: "clean-void" bag versus catheter urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in young children.
    McGillivray D; Mok E; Mulrooney E; Kramer MS
    J Pediatr; 2005 Oct; 147(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 16227029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nappy pad urine samples for investigation and treatment of UTI in young children: the 'DUTY' prospective diagnostic cohort study.
    Butler CC; Sterne JA; Lawton M; O'Brien K; Wootton M; Hood K; Hollingworth W; Little P; Delaney BC; van der Voort J; Dudley J; Birnie K; Pickles T; Waldron CA; Downing H; Thomas-Jones E; Lisles C; Rumsby K; Durbaba S; Whiting P; Harman K; Howe R; MacGowan A; Fletcher M; Hay AD
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Jul; 66(648):e516-24. PubMed ID: 27364678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving clean-catch contamination rates: A prospective interventional cohort study.
    Teo S; Cheek JA; Craig S
    Emerg Med Australas; 2016 Dec; 28(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 27778452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aerobic bacterial culture of used intravenous fluid bags intended for use as urine collection reservoirs.
    Barrett M; Campbell VL
    J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2008; 44(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 18175792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.