These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15814445)

  • 1. A test for measuring recognition and naming of landmarks.
    Tranel D; Enekwechi N; Manzel K
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Jan; 27(1):102-26. PubMed ID: 15814445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does sex influence the age of acquisition of common names? A contrast of different semantic categories.
    Barbarotto R; Laiacona M; Capitani E
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1161-70. PubMed ID: 18761130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impaired naming of unique landmarks is associated with left temporal polar damage.
    Tranel D
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Jan; 20(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16460217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A screening test of English naming ability in bilingual Spanish/English speakers.
    Casas R; Calamia M; Tranel D
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Nov; 30(8):956-66. PubMed ID: 18608656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related changes in arm-hand postural knowledge.
    Mozaz MJ; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Dec; 26(8):675-84. PubMed ID: 20401769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Hatfield Image Test (HIT): a new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use.
    Adlington RL; Laws KR; Gale TM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Aug; 31(6):731-53. PubMed ID: 19105074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Famous face recognition and naming test: a normative study.
    Rizzo S; Venneri A; Papagno C
    Neurol Sci; 2002 Oct; 23(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 12536284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equivalent activation of the hippocampus by face-face and face-laugh paired associate learning and recognition.
    Holdstock JS; Crane J; Bachorowski JA; Milner B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3757-71. PubMed ID: 20797401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An fMRI investigation of strategies for word recognition.
    Edwards JD; Pexman PM; Goodyear BG; Chambers CG
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):648-62. PubMed ID: 15893458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rated familiarity, visual complexity, and image agreement and their relation to naming difficulty for items from the Boston naming test.
    Himmanen SA; Gentles K; Sailor K
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1178-85. PubMed ID: 14566589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiarity-based recognition in the young, healthy elderly, mild cognitive impaired and Alzheimer's patients.
    Algarabel S; Escudero J; Mazón JF; Pitarque A; Fuentes M; Peset V; Lacruz L
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2056-64. PubMed ID: 19467356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Language experience shapes early electrophysiological responses to visual stimuli: the effects of writing system, stimulus length, and presentation duration.
    Xue G; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):2025-37. PubMed ID: 18053744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decomposing the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading ability.
    Arnell KM; Joanisse MF; Klein RM; Busseri MA; Tannock R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 19739900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of the electrophysiological correlates of retrieval cue processing by the specificity of task demands.
    Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1071(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 16413511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modality-specific naming deficit: cognitive and neural mechanisms implicated in naming to definition.
    Marangolo P; Rinaldi M; Sabatini U
    Neurocase; 2004 Aug; 10(4):280-9. PubMed ID: 15788265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in brain activation during encoding and recognition of male and female faces.
    Ino T; Nakai R; Azuma T; Kimura T; Fukuyama H
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2010 Mar; 4(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 20503114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potential repetition effects at encoding predict memory performance at test.
    Groh-Bordin C; Busch NA; Herrmann CS; Zimmer HD
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1905-9. PubMed ID: 18007184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conceptual priming and familiarity: different expressions of memory during recognition testing with distinct neurophysiological correlates.
    Voss JL; Lucas HD; Paller KA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2638-51. PubMed ID: 19702474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modes of memory: early electrophysiological markers of repetition suppression and recognition enhancement predict behavioral performance.
    Busch NA; Groh-Bordin C; Zimmer HD; Herrmann CS
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 17910732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.