These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

901 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15817170)

  • 1. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Nov; 22(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 18999347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
    Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Jan; 46(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 19147129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Cortex; 2010 Mar; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.
    Ellis AW; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: a critical assessment of recent research.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2341-53. PubMed ID: 18723038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
    McCormick SF; Davis CJ; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.
    Lavidor M; Walsh V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12729488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP evidence for the split fovea theory.
    Martin CD; Thierry G; Démonet JF; Roberts M; Nazir T
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1185():212-20. PubMed ID: 17956755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why word length only matters in the left visual field.
    Whitney C; Lavidor M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1680-8. PubMed ID: 15327934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Split Fovea Theory and the Leicester critique: what do the data say?
    Van der Haegen L; Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 19698725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mechanisms underlying the interhemispheric integration of information in foveal word recognition: evidence for transcortical inhibition.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):81-9. PubMed ID: 20430428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do fixation cues ensure fixation accuracy in split-fovea studies of word recognition?
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Kurtev S; Xu M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):2004-7. PubMed ID: 19133280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M; Davis CJ
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision.
    Perea M; Fraga I
    Brain Lang; 2006 Apr; 97(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 16183108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.