These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15817177)

  • 1. Attentional control parameters following parietal-lobe damage: evidence from normal subjects.
    Vecera SP; Flevaris AV
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1189-203. PubMed ID: 15817177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of saliency, not global dominance, in patients with left parietal damage.
    Mevorach C; Humphreys GW; Shalev L
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(2):307-19. PubMed ID: 15936046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience.
    Geng JJ; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1584-601. PubMed ID: 18752405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of the cholinergic agonist nicotine on reorienting of visual spatial attention and top-down attentional control.
    Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Mar; 152(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 18272290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex.
    Vossel S; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16846742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The frontal cortex and exogenous attentional orienting.
    Snyder JJ; Chatterjee A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1913-23. PubMed ID: 17069481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A selective effect of parietal damage on letter identification in mixed case words.
    Braet W; Humphreys G
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jun; 45(10):2226-33. PubMed ID: 17382976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An impaired attentional dwell time after parietal and frontal lesions related to impaired selective attention not unilateral neglect.
    Correani A; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Jul; 28(5):363-85. PubMed ID: 22292859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Numerical processing overcomes left neglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Neuroreport; 2008 May; 19(8):835-8. PubMed ID: 18463497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):667-88. PubMed ID: 15301617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction.
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
    Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An onset advantage without a preview benefit: neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.
    Humphreys GW; Olivers CN; Yoon EY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 16417687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual grouping in the human brain: common processing of different cues.
    Seymour K; Karnath HO; Himmelbach M
    Neuroreport; 2008 Dec; 19(18):1769-72. PubMed ID: 18955906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Searching with unilateral neglect.
    Pavlovskaya M; Ring H; Groswasser Z; Hochstein S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jul; 14(5):745-56. PubMed ID: 12167259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.