145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15817618)
1. The influence of mandibular prominence on facial attractiveness.
Johnston C; Hunt O; Burden D; Stevenson M; Hepper P
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Apr; 27(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 15817618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the influence of lower facial profile convexity on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Sep; 114(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 22883980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychologic implications of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class II or Class ill malocclusion.
Gerzanic L; Jagsch R; Watzke IM
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 12099319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in soft tissue profile after mandibular setback surgery in Class III subjects.
Marşan G; Oztaş E; Kuvat SV; Cura N; Emekli U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 19153028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment.
O'Neill K; Harkness M; Knight R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):371-6; discussion 377. PubMed ID: 11029730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the influence of chin prominence on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician and layperson.
Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 41(7):839-46. PubMed ID: 22340990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women.
Michiels G; Sather AH
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 7989819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study.
Johnston C; Burden D; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16979487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
