These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15817695)
1. Comment on 'Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments'. Dobbin KK; Shih JH; Simon RM Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2803-4. PubMed ID: 15817695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Answer to the comments of K. Dobbin, J. Shih and R. Simon on the paper 'Evaluation of the gene-specific dye-bias in cDNA microarray experiments'. Martin-Magniette ML; Aubert J; Cabannes E; Daudin JJ Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3065. PubMed ID: 15941744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments. Martin-Magniette ML; Aubert J; Cabannes E; Daudin JJ Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 15691855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Some statistical issues in microarray gene expression data. Mayo MS; Gajewski BJ; Morris JS Radiat Res; 2006 Jun; 165(6):745-8. PubMed ID: 16802876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Profound normalisation challenges remain in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Lyons-Weiler J Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 15130790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A new outlier removal approach for cDNA microarray normalization. Wu Y; Yan L; Liu H; Sun H; Xie H Biotechniques; 2009 Aug; 47(2):691-2, 694-700. PubMed ID: 19737130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the performance of microarray segmentation algorithms. Lehmussola A; Ruusuvuori P; Yli-Harja O Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(23):2910-7. PubMed ID: 17032673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removal of hybridization and scanning noise from microarrays. Gopalappa C; Das TK; Enkemann S; Eschrich S IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2009 Sep; 8(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 20051337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integration of statistical inference methods and a novel control measure to improve sensitivity and specificity of data analysis in expression profiling studies. Zang S; Guo R; Zhang L; Lu Y J Biomed Inform; 2007 Oct; 40(5):552-60. PubMed ID: 17317331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MicroPreP: a cDNA microarray data pre-processing framework. van Hijum SA; GarcĂa de la Nava J; Trelles O; Kok J; Kuipers OP Appl Bioinformatics; 2003; 2(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 15130795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification and handling of artifactual gene expression profiles emerging in microarray hybridization experiments. Brodsky L; Leontovich A; Shtutman M; Feinstein E Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Mar; 32(4):e46. PubMed ID: 14999086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical analysis of an RNA titration series evaluates microarray precision and sensitivity on a whole-array basis. Holloway AJ; Oshlack A; Diyagama DS; Bowtell DD; Smyth GK BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():511. PubMed ID: 17118209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Smyth GK; Michaud J; Scott HS Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):2067-75. PubMed ID: 15657102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An ensemble approach to microarray data-based gene prioritization after missing value imputation. Hua D; Lai Y Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 17267438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]