These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1581792)
1. The determination of total filtration on mammographic X-ray sets. Robson KJ; Kotre CJ; Faulkner K Br J Radiol; 1992 Apr; 65(772):334-8. PubMed ID: 1581792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations. Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. Boone JM; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1863-74. PubMed ID: 9434969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short communication: kilovoltage measurement with rhodium target and filters on mammography X-ray machines. Underwood AC; Law J; Goodman DA; Robinson A; Rust A Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):769-73. PubMed ID: 8949681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calculated mammographic spectra confirmed with attenuation curves for molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten targets. Blough MM; Waggener RG; Payne WH; Terry JA Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1605-12. PubMed ID: 9775364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dependence of scatter on atomic number for x rays from tungsten and molybdenum anodes in the mammographic energy range. Aus RJ; DeWerd LA; Pearson DW; Micka JA; Ng KH Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 10435532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. Boone JM Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray spectra in mammography. Ng KP; Kwok CS; Tang FH Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1309-18. PubMed ID: 10843106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of x-ray spectra and outputs from molybdenum and tungsten targets. Marshall M; Peaple LH; Ardran GM; Crooks HE Br J Radiol; 1975 Jan; 48(565):31-9. PubMed ID: 1109625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector]. Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Investigations on contrast values in mammography (author's transl)]. Schüle E; Seeger W Rofo; 1981 Aug; 135(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 6212315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computation of beam quality parameters for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, and W/Al target/filter combinations in mammography. Kharrati H; Zarrad B Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2638-42. PubMed ID: 14596300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography. Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A fit method for the determination of inherent filtration with diagnostic x-ray units. Meghzifene K; Aiginger H; Nowotny R Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2585-97. PubMed ID: 16675871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voltage waveform effects on output and penetration of W- and Mo-anode mammographic tubes. O'Foghludha F; Johnson GA Phys Med Biol; 1981 Mar; 26(2):291-303. PubMed ID: 7220605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]