These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15820520)

  • 1. Visually perceived vertical (VPV): induced changes in orientation by 1-line and 2-line roll-tilted and pitched visual fields.
    Li W; Matin L
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):2037-57. PubMed ID: 15820520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation.
    Matin L; Li W
    J Vestib Res; 1995; 5(6):499-518. PubMed ID: 8589859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A tilted frame deceives the eye and the hand.
    Li W; Matin E; Bertz JW; Matin L
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(16):18.1-16. PubMed ID: 19146284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mislocalizations of visual elevation and visual vertical induced by visual pitch: the great circle model.
    Matin L; Li W
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1992 May; 656():242-65. PubMed ID: 1599147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL).
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 2001 Oct; 41(22):2845-72. PubMed ID: 11701180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical.
    Vingerhoets RA; De Vrijer M; Van Gisbergen JA; Medendorp WP
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1321-33. PubMed ID: 19118112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Averaging and summation of influences on visually perceived eye level between two long lines differing in pitch or roll-tilt.
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 1999 Jan; 39(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 10326138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visually perceived eye level is influenced identically by lines from erect and pitched planes.
    Li W; Matin L
    Perception; 1996; 25(7):831-52. PubMed ID: 8923552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of lateral head inclination on multimodal spatial orientation judgments in neglect: evidence for impaired spatial orientation constancy.
    Funk J; Finke K; Müller HJ; Utz KS; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1616-27. PubMed ID: 20138897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.
    Asch SE; Witkin HA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Dec; 121(4):407-18; discussion 404-6. PubMed ID: 1431735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear combinations of signals from two lines of the same or different orientations.
    Matin L; Li W
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 10820610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The rod-and-frame effect: the whole is less than the sum of its parts.
    Li W; Matin L
    Perception; 2005; 34(6):699-716. PubMed ID: 16042192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.
    Zupan LH; Merfeld DM
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):390-400. PubMed ID: 12522188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision.
    De Vrijer M; Medendorp WP; Van Gisbergen JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Feb; 99(2):915-30. PubMed ID: 18094098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The plasticity of gravitational reference frame and the subjective vertical: peripheral visual information affects the oblique effect.
    Luyat M; Mobarek S; Leconte C; Gentaz E
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 385(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15964678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability.
    Tarnutzer AA; Bockisch C; Straumann D; Olasagasti I
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1657-71. PubMed ID: 19571203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isotropic visual field effect on spatial orientation and egocentric localization.
    Poquin D; Ohlmann T; Barraud PA
    Spat Vis; 1998; 11(3):261-78. PubMed ID: 9584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mirror symmetry and parallelism: two opposite rules for the identity transform in space perception and their unified treatment by the Great Circle Model.
    Matin L; Li W
    Spat Vis; 1994; 8(4):469-89. PubMed ID: 7772552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived self-orientation in allocentric and egocentric space: effects of visual and physical tilt on saccadic and tactile measures.
    Barnett-Cowan M; Harris LR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():231-43. PubMed ID: 18706895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in perceived elevation and verticality: evidence of a common visual process.
    Shavit AY; Li W; Matin L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(3):205-39. PubMed ID: 23964476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.