These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15820633)

  • 1. Differential processing of word and color in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Morein-Zamir S; Henik A; Balas M; Soroker N
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):259-69. PubMed ID: 15820633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
    Snow JC; Mattingley JB
    Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect.
    Shimozaki S; Kingstone A; Olk B; Stowe R; Eckstein M
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming of color and position during visual search in unilateral spatial neglect.
    Kristjánsson A; Vuilleumier P; Malhotra P; Husain M; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 17(6):859-73. PubMed ID: 15969905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Schnider A; Golay L; Müri R
    Brain; 2007 Dec; 130(Pt 12):3211-22. PubMed ID: 17905795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding the effects of moving visual stimuli on unilateral neglect following stroke.
    Plummer P; Dunai J; Morris ME
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar; 60(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 16466838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements.
    Doricchi F; Guariglia P; Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Bruno G; Gasparini M
    Brain; 2005 Jun; 128(Pt 6):1386-406. PubMed ID: 15758037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task.
    Morimoto HM; Hirose S; Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2006-14. PubMed ID: 18416674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect?
    Natale E; Posteraro L; Prior M; Marzi CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1072-85. PubMed ID: 15769493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
    Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased attentional demands impair contralesional space awareness following stroke.
    Bonato M; Priftis K; Marenzi R; Umiltà C; Zorzi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3934-40. PubMed ID: 20801136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preserved obstacle avoidance during reaching in patients with left visual neglect.
    McIntosh RD; McClements KI; Dijkerman HC; Birchall D; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(8):1107-17. PubMed ID: 15093149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electroencephalographic activity in a flanker interference task using Japanese orthography.
    Yamaguchi S; Toyoda G; Xu J; Kobayashi S; Henik A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):971-9. PubMed ID: 12419122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect.
    Malhotra P; Jäger HR; Parton A; Greenwood R; Playford ED; Brown MM; Driver J; Husain M
    Brain; 2005 Feb; 128(Pt 2):424-35. PubMed ID: 15644422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of distracters, stimulus duration and hemianopia on first saccade in patients with unilateral neglect.
    Gainotti G; De Luca L; Figliozzi F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 19231479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The inferior temporal lobe mediates distracter-resistant visual search of patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Valenza N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):788-99. PubMed ID: 15904545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.