805 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15821590)
1. In vitro comparison of stone retropulsion and fragmentation of the frequency doubled, double pulse nd:yag laser and the holmium:yag laser.
Marguet CG; Sung JC; Springhart WP; L'Esperance JO; Zhou S; Zhong P; Albala DM; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2005 May; 173(5):1797-800. PubMed ID: 15821590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser fiber proximity to the target stone on transient cavitation and acoustic emission.
Fuh E; Haleblian GE; Norris RD; Albala WD; Simmons N; Zhong P; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1542-5. PubMed ID: 17382775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the FREDDY and holmium lasers during ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Yates J; Zabbo A; Pareek G
Lasers Surg Med; 2007 Sep; 39(8):637-40. PubMed ID: 17886276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal power settings for Holmium:YAG lithotripsy.
Sea J; Jonat LM; Chew BH; Qiu J; Wang B; Hoopman J; Milner T; Teichman JM
J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):914-9. PubMed ID: 22264464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy.
Kang HW; Lee H; Teichman JM; Oh J; Kim J; Welch AJ
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Sep; 38(8):762-72. PubMed ID: 16868932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro analysis of stone fragmentation ability of the FREDDY laser.
Delvecchio FC; Auge BK; Brizuela RM; Weizer AZ; Zhong P; Preminger GM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 12803991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro.
Finley DS; Petersen J; Abdelshehid C; Ahlering M; Chou D; Borin J; Eichel L; McDougall E; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2005 Oct; 19(8):1041-4. PubMed ID: 16253078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of nitinol urological retrieval coil and ureteral occlusion device: retropulsion and holmium laser fragmentation efficiency.
Lee HJ; Box GN; Abraham JB; Deane LA; Elchico ER; Eisner BH; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):969-73. PubMed ID: 18656905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of an antiretropulsion device to prevent stone retropulsion significantly increases the efficiency of pneumatic lithotripsy: an in vitro study.
Eisner BH; Pengune W; Stoller ML
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 19338527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laser induced fragmentation of salivary stones: an in vitro comparison of two different, clinically approved laser systems.
Siedek V; Betz CS; Hecht V; Blagova R; Vogeser M; Zengel P; Berghaus A; Leunig A; Sroka R
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Apr; 40(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 18412223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Erbium: YAG versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy.
Teichman JM; Chan KF; Cecconi PP; Corbin NS; Kamerer AD; Glickman RD; Welch AJ
J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):876-9. PubMed ID: 11176490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In Vitro Comparison of Stone Fragmentation When Using Various Settings with Modern Variable Pulse Holmium Lasers.
Bell JR; Penniston KL; Nakada SY
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1067-1072. PubMed ID: 28728505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of holmium:YAG laser with Lithoclast lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation.
Jeon SS; Hyun JH; Lee KS
Int J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):544-7. PubMed ID: 15985075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stone Retropulsion with Ho: YAG and Tm: YAG Lasers: A Clinical Practice-Oriented Experimental Study.
Kamal W; Kallidonis P; Koukiou G; Amanatides L; Panagopoulos V; Ntasiotis P; Liatsikos E
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1145-1149. PubMed ID: 27527803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of pulse energy, frequency and length on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser fragmentation efficiency in non-floating artificial urinary calculi.
Wezel F; Häcker A; Gross AJ; Michel MS; Bach T
J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1135-40. PubMed ID: 20575700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of retropulsion caused by holmium:YAG laser with various power settings and fibers.
White MD; Moran ME; Calvano CJ; Borhan-Manesh A; Mehlhaff BA
J Endourol; 1998 Apr; 12(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 9607447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.
Andreeva V; Vinarov A; Yaroslavsky I; Kovalenko A; Vybornov A; Rapoport L; Enikeev D; Sorokin N; Dymov A; Tsarichenko D; Glybochko P; Fried N; Traxer O; Altshuler G; Gapontsev V
World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 31055626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-Frequency Dusting Versus Conventional Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Intrarenal and Ureteral Calculi.
Li R; Ruckle D; Keheila M; Maldonado J; Lightfoot M; Alsyouf M; Yeo A; Abourbih SR; Olgin G; Arenas JL; Baldwin DD
J Endourol; 2017 Mar; 31(3):272-277. PubMed ID: 27960541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature.
Eisner BH; Dretler SP
Urol Int; 2009; 82(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 19440028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Er:YAG laser endoscopic fiber delivery system for lithotripsy of salivary stones.
Raif J; Vardi M; Nahlieli O; Gannot I
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Jul; 38(6):580-7. PubMed ID: 16705704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
