These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15821691)

  • 21. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients.
    Usumez S; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA; Karaman AI; Guray E
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 15529493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement.
    Hägg U; Rabie AB; Bendeus M; Wong RW; Wey MC; Du X; Peng J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 18929270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 1452055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Skeletal and dental outcomes of a new magnetic functional appliance, the Sydney Magnoglide, in Class II correction.
    Phelan A; Tarraf NE; Taylor P; Hönscheid R; Drescher D; Baccetti T; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):759-72. PubMed ID: 22640678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
    Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A cephalometric study of the Class II correction effects of the Eureka Spring.
    Stromeyer EL; Caruso JM; DeVincenzo JP
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 12071603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of the Sander bite-jumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Martina R; Cioffi I; Galeotti A; Tagliaferri R; Cimino R; Michelotti A; Valletta R; Farella M; Paduano S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 May; 16(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 23323608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment of developing Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Jumper Twin Block.
    Hammad SM; Bashir ES; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 22873025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treatment effects of a modified quad-helix in patients with dentoskeletal open bites.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):734-9. PubMed ID: 16769491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
    Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Dynamax system: a new orthopaedic appliance and case report.
    Bass NM
    J Orthod; 2006 Jun; 33(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 16751429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
    Luo Y; Fang G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.