These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15821697)

  • 1. New, fast, and accurate procedure to calibrate a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):518-9. PubMed ID: 15821697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of Bolton tooth-size ratios by digitization, and comparison with the traditional method.
    Paredes V; Gandia JL; Cibrian R
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16373454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
    Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new way of analyzing occlusion 3 dimensionally.
    Hayasaki H; Martins RP; Gandini LG; Saitoh I; Nonaka K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):128-32. PubMed ID: 16027637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of a 3-D laser scanner for crown width measurements.
    Nouri M; Massudi R; Bagheban AA; Azimi S; Fereidooni F
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 19634463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision of a system for assessing severity of tooth wear.
    Haketa T; Baba K; Akishige S; Fueki K; Kino K; Ohyama T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 15543915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examination of Bolton Index comparing the traditional method with a 2-dimensional digital measurement method.
    Roşu S; Zetu I; Ogodescu A; Veiszenbacher E; Mártha KI
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 24741801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional quantification of color-marked occlusal paths on anatomically oriented casts.
    Dirksen D; Runte C; Böröcz Z; Thomas C; von Bally G; Bollmann F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 11208205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A system for digital reconstruction of gypsum dental casts.
    Goshtasby AA; Nambala S; deRijk WG; Campbell SD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):664-74. PubMed ID: 9368122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evidence supporting methods of tooth width measurement: Part II. Digital models and intra-oral scanners.
    Naidu D; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 24380136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D; Freer TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.
    Cuperus AM; Harms MC; Rangel FA; Bronkhorst EM; Schols JG; Breuning KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of methods for measurement of hypoplastic lesions.
    Elcock C; Smith RN; Simpson J; Abdellatif A; Bäckman B; Brook AH
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 May; 114 Suppl 1():365-9; discussion 375-6, 382-3. PubMed ID: 16674714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method.
    Tomassetti JJ; Taloumis LJ; Denny JM; Fischer JR
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 11605868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional digitization: method for evaluating morphological differences between teeth.
    Soma K; Kuroki T; Nakamura T; Miura F
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1991 Mar; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2025911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between a new 2-dimensional digital on-screen tooth measurement method with direct measurements.
    Sonbol HN; Al-Omari IK; Duaibis RB; Saleh MW; Al-Bitar ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2011 Sep; 32(9):895-900. PubMed ID: 21894350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.