These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1582278)

  • 21. Review of proficiency testing performance of laboratories accredited by the College of American Pathologists.
    Hoeltge GA; Duckworth JK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1987 Nov; 111(11):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3662764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. External and internal QC for blood gases.
    Jordan A
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2016 Aug; 48(8):36. PubMed ID: 29924545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing precision and accuracy in blood gas proficiency testing.
    Rao AV
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1992 Feb; 145(2 Pt 1):498. PubMed ID: 1736765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Blood gas proficiency testing.
    Clausen JL; Sutt-Corbett B
    Respir Ther; 1984; 14(2):68-72, 75-6. PubMed ID: 10265554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multicentre evaluation of the blood gas-electrolyte-analyser "BGE".
    Barth E; Müller-Plathe O; Haeckel R; Römer M; Keller HE
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1991 Apr; 29(4):281-92. PubMed ID: 1907856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Blood gas analyzers.
    Stiles DA
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2007; 41(5):377-8. PubMed ID: 17992802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Survey of special practices associated with College of American Pathologists proficiency testing in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
    Cembrowski GS; Vanderlinde RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):374-6. PubMed ID: 3355335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of new federal regulations on the blood gas laboratory.
    Casaburi R
    Chest; 1992 Jan; 101(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 1729107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A user's classification of problems identified by proficiency testing surveys.
    Klee GG; Forsman RW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 3355334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can you really trust your blood gas lab?
    Cooper OV
    Med Times; 1975 Feb; 103(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 1117817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laboratory evaluation and assistance efforts: mailed, on-site and blind proficiency testing surveys conducted by the Centers for Disease Control.
    Boone DJ; Hansen HJ; Hearn TL; Lewis DS; Dudley D
    Am J Public Health; 1982 Dec; 72(12):1364-8. PubMed ID: 6291415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Blood gas testing in the laboratory and at the point of care. Finding the right mix.
    Toffaletti J
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Sep; Suppl():14-7; quiz 34-5. PubMed ID: 10174089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Study on proficiency test for determination of aluminum in drinking water in 2016].
    Yang J; Cao N; Dong M
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2018 Jan; 47(1):85-88. PubMed ID: 29903229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality improvement of diagnostic microbiology through a peer-group proficiency assessment program. A 20-year experience in Ontario. The Microbiology Committee.
    Richardson H; Wood D; Whitby J; Lannigan R; Fleming C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 May; 120(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 8639047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Summary and analysis of the mycology proficiency testing survey results of the College of American Pathologists. 1976-1979.
    Fuchs PC; Dolan CT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Oct; 76(4 Suppl):538-43. PubMed ID: 6792904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Analysis results of proficiency test for determination of lindane in drinking water in 2016].
    Cao N; Dong M; Yang J
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2018 Jan; 47(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 29903230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of multianalyte proficiency test results by sum of ranking differences, principal component analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis.
    Škrbić B; Héberger K; Durišić-Mladenović N
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2013 Oct; 405(25):8363-75. PubMed ID: 23912826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analytic accuracy and survey results.
    Burnett RW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jul; 82(1):130-1. PubMed ID: 6741871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quality control of blood gas analysis: a review.
    Elser RC
    Respir Care; 1986 Sep; 31(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 10315708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing.
    Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Sep; 117(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 8368899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.