146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15823245)
1. Encoding specificity manipulations do affect retrieval from memory.
Zeelenberg R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 May; 119(1):107-21. PubMed ID: 15823245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited.
Higham PA
Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 11958356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implicit false memory in the DRM paradigm: effects of amnesia, encoding instructions, and encoding duration.
Van Damme I; d'Ydewalle G
Neuropsychology; 2009 Sep; 23(5):635-48. PubMed ID: 19702417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks.
Kormi-Nouri R; Shojaei RS; Moniri S; Gholami AR; Moradi AR; Akbari-Zardkhaneh S; Nilsson LG
Scand J Psychol; 2008 Apr; 49(2):93-109. PubMed ID: 18352979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mood-state-dependent retrieval: the effects of induced mood on memory reconsidered.
Kenealy PM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 May; 50(2):290-317. PubMed ID: 9225625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of sensory attributes as retrieval cues or as interference in retrieval of information from episodic memory.
Krane AR
J Gen Psychol; 1979 Oct; 101(2d Half,):227-47. PubMed ID: 533847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Encoding specificity: retrieval asymmetry in the recognition failure paradigm.
Bartling CA; Thompson CP
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 Nov; 3(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 915447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective memory: the relative effects of encoding, retrieval, and the match between encoding and retrieval.
Hannon B; Daneman M
Memory; 2007 Jul; 15(5):572-604. PubMed ID: 17613799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feelings of knowing in the Ranschburg effect.
Florer FL; Allen G
Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 10862341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Involuntary conscious memory facilitates cued recall performance: further evidence that chaining occurs during voluntary recall.
Mace JH
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):371-81. PubMed ID: 19827705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
von Essen JD
Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrieval experience in prospective memory: strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval.
Meier B; Zimmermann TD; Perrig WJ
Memory; 2006 Oct; 14(7):872-89. PubMed ID: 16938698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The myth of the encoding-retrieval match.
Nairne JS
Memory; 2002; 10(5-6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12396651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Context binding in schizophrenia: effects of clinical symptomatology and item content.
Diaz-Asper C; Malley J; Genderson M; Apud J; Elvevåg B
Psychiatry Res; 2008 Jun; 159(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 18442860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Priming guesses on a forced-recall test.
Gibson JM; Meade ML
J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jul; 131(3):225-41. PubMed ID: 15248592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exhaustive and heuristic retrieval processes in person cognition: further tests of the TRAP model.
Garcia-Marques L; Hamilton DL; Maddox KB
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Feb; 82(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 11831410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age differences in encoding specificity.
Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
