These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15823873)

  • 1. Variations in occupant response with seat belt slack and anchor location during moderate frontal impacts.
    Siegmund GP; Chimich DD; Heinrichs BE; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15823873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of belt pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear-impact sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2012; 13(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 22239146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 36135987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rebound after rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 23343027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():423-31. PubMed ID: 22269526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinetic and kinematic responses of post mortem human surrogates and the Hybrid III ATD in high-speed frontal sled tests.
    Beeman SM; Kemper AR; Madigan ML; Duma SM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jun; 55():34-47. PubMed ID: 23507433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinematics of pediatric crash dummies seated on vehicle seats with realistic belt geometry.
    Klinich KD; Reed MP; Ebert SM; Rupp JD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):866-74. PubMed ID: 24884476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An inflatable belt system in the rear seat occupant environment: investigating feasibility and benefit in frontal impact sled tests with a 50(th) percentile male ATD.
    Forman JL; Lopez-Valdes FJ; Dennis N; Kent RW; Tanji H; Higuchi K
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2010; 54():111-26. PubMed ID: 21050596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of THOR and Hybrid III dummy lower neck loads to belt systems in frontal impact.
    Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Moore J; Maiman DJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Feb; 12(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21259178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of collision pulse properties on seven proposed whiplash injury criteria.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; DeMarco AL; Brault JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 15667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of seat belt restraint system.
    Sances A; Kumaresan S; Herbst B; Meyer S; Hock D
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():377-80. PubMed ID: 15133987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of pediatric ATD biofidelity as compared to child volunteers in low-speed far-side oblique and lateral impacts.
    Seacrist T; Locey CM; Mathews EA; Jones DL; Balasubramanian S; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S206-14. PubMed ID: 25307388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BioRID dummy responses in matched ABTS and conventional seat tests on the IIHS rear sled.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 21823942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of occupant kinematics and dynamics in nearside oblique impacts.
    López-Valdés FJ; Juste-Lorente O; Maza-Frechin M; Pipkorn B; Sunnevang C; Lorente A; Aso-Vizan A; Davidsson J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():86-92. PubMed ID: 27586108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of volunteers and dummy upper torso kinematics with and without shoulder belt slack in a low speed side/pre-roll environment.
    Parenteau C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2006 Jun; 7(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 16854710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of occupant anthropometry during frontal collisions.
    Frieder R; Kumar S; Sances A
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2007; 43():75-80. PubMed ID: 17487060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of retractor and anchor pretensioning on dummy responses in 40 km/h rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Burnett RA; Miller GA; Parenteau CS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):396-400. PubMed ID: 33886404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Human occupants in low-speed frontal sled tests: effects of pre-impact bracing on chest compression, reaction forces, and subject acceleration.
    Kemper AR; Beeman SM; Madigan ML; Duma SM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S141-50. PubMed ID: 25307379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.
    Viano DC; Parenteau CS; Burnett R; Prasad P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 28678610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.