These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1582458)
1. Skeletal and dento-alveolar changes as a result of headgear activator therapy related to different vertical growth patterns. Dermaut LR; van den Eynde F; de Pauw G Eur J Orthod; 1992 Apr; 14(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 1582458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances. Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation. Cura N; Saraç M Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance. Bendeus M; Hägg U; Rabie B Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Apr; 121(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 11997762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1. Carels C; Reychler A; van der Linden FP J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective cephalometric evaluation of dental changes with activator and activator headgear combination in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion. Lall R; Kumar GA; Maheshwari A; Kumar M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Jan; 12(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 22186684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes. Marşan G Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Keeling SD; Wheeler TT; King GJ; Garvan CW; Cohen DA; Cabassa S; McGorray SP; Taylor MG Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 9457018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cephalometric investigation of the effects of the Elastic Bite-block in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Erverdi N; Ozkan G Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):375-84. PubMed ID: 8529750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I. Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible? Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion. Spalj S; Mroz Tranesen K; Birkeland K; Katic V; Pavlic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():4861924. PubMed ID: 28203569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention. Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Control of vertical dimension in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using a combined activator and extraoral traction appliance]. Chabre C Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():617-33. PubMed ID: 2490243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Frankel functional regulator. Rushforth CD; Gordon PH; Aird JC Br J Orthod; 1999 Jun; 26(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10420247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report. Weiland FJ; Bantleon HP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7572845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The frequency and distribution of skeletal and dental components in Class II orthognathic surgery patients. Lawrence TN; Ellis E; McNamara JA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1985 Jan; 43(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 3855314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The initial effects of the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions with the van Beek activator compared with the effects of the Herren activator and an activator-headgear combination. Altenburger E; Ingervall B Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 9753820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term effects of Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Omblus J; Malmgren O; Pancherz H; Hägg U; Hansen K Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 9183068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]