These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15826232)

  • 1. On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Remington RW; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):299-315. PubMed ID: 15826232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing between the partial-mapping preparation hypothesis and the failure-to-engage hypothesis of residual switch costs.
    Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1207-26. PubMed ID: 20731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?
    Monsell S; Mizon GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):493-516. PubMed ID: 16822121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advance preparation and stimulus-induced interference in cued task switching: further insights from BOLD fMRI.
    Ruge H; Brass M; Koch I; Rubin O; Meiran N; von Cramon DY
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(3):340-55. PubMed ID: 15707612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The costs of crossing paths and switching tasks between audition and vision.
    Murray MM; De Santis L; Thut G; Wylie GR
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Feb; 69(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 18571299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age differences in switching the relevant stimulus dimensions in a speeded same-different judgment paradigm.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 20598271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):892-9. PubMed ID: 17723067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-set switching deficits in early-stage Huntington's disease: implications for basal ganglia function.
    Aron AR; Watkins L; Sahakian BJ; Monsell S; Barker RA; Robbins TW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):629-42. PubMed ID: 12965037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task preparation and stimulus-evoked competition.
    Hübner M; Kluwe RH; Luna-Rodriguez A; Peters A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004; 115(2-3):211-34. PubMed ID: 14962401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity.
    Correa A; Triviño M; Pérez-Dueñas C; Acosta A; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 20566235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating neural indices of dynamic cognitive control in advance task-set preparation: an ERP study of task switching.
    Astle DE; Jackson GM; Swainson R
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1125(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 17087918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related differences in switching between cognitive tasks: does internal control ability decline with age?
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kuhns D
    Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18573007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching.
    Gruber O; Karch S; Schlueter EK; Falkai P; Goschke T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):887-95. PubMed ID: 16490365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors.
    Milán EG; González A; Sanabria D; Pereda A; Hochel M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 16310155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.