BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

859 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15826317)

  • 1. Many accurate small-discriminatory feature subsets exist in microarray transcript data: biomarker discovery.
    Grate LR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():97. PubMed ID: 15826317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In silico microdissection of microarray data from heterogeneous cell populations.
    Lähdesmäki H; Shmulevich L; Dunmire V; Yli-Harja O; Zhang W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():54. PubMed ID: 15766384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene expression analysis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using gene set enrichment analysis for biostatistical management.
    Maruschke M; Reuter D; Koczan D; Hakenberg OW; Thiesen HJ
    BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(2 Pt 2):E29-35. PubMed ID: 21435154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regularized Least Squares Cancer classifiers from DNA microarray data.
    Ancona N; Maglietta R; D'Addabbo A; Liuni S; Pesole G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S2. PubMed ID: 16351746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tumor classification ranking from microarray data.
    Hewett R; Kijsanayothin P
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S21. PubMed ID: 18831787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate cancer classification using expressions of very few genes.
    Wang L; Chu F; Xie W
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2007; 4(1):40-53. PubMed ID: 17277412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of cancer gene-profiling data.
    Yang X; Sun X
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 576():409-26. PubMed ID: 19882274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What should be expected from feature selection in small-sample settings.
    Sima C; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2430-6. PubMed ID: 16870934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A stable iterative method for refining discriminative gene clusters.
    Xu M; Zhu M; Zhang L
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S18. PubMed ID: 18831783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of microarray data with factor mixture models.
    Martella F
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 16287938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges in projecting clustering results across gene expression-profiling datasets.
    Lusa L; McShane LM; Reid JF; De Cecco L; Ambrogi F; Biganzoli E; Gariboldi M; Pierotti MA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(22):1715-23. PubMed ID: 18000217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new classification model with simple decision rule for discovering optimal feature gene pairs.
    Li J; Tang X
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Nov; 37(11):1637-46. PubMed ID: 17482157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consensus analysis of multiple classifiers using non-repetitive variables: diagnostic application to microarray gene expression data.
    Su Z; Hong H; Perkins R; Shao X; Cai W; Tong W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Feb; 31(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17303535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis.
    Culhane AC; Perrière G; Higgins DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 4():59. PubMed ID: 14633289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A gene selection method for classifying cancer samples using 1D discrete wavelet transform.
    Jose A; Mugler D; Duan ZH
    Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2009; 2(4):398-411. PubMed ID: 20090179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevant and significant supervised gene clusters for microarray cancer classification.
    Maji P; Das C
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2012 Jun; 11(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22552589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and evaluation of Actichip, a thematic microarray for the study of the actin cytoskeleton.
    Muller J; Mehlen A; Vetter G; Yatskou M; Muller A; Chalmel F; Poch O; Friederich E; Vallar L
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Aug; 8():294. PubMed ID: 17727702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A leukemia-enriched cDNA microarray platform identifies new transcripts with relevance to the biology of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
    De Pittà C; Tombolan L; Campo Dell'Orto M; Accordi B; te Kronnie G; Romualdi C; Vitulo N; Basso G; Lanfranchi G
    Haematologica; 2005 Jul; 90(7):890-8. PubMed ID: 15996926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.