277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15826855)
1. Evaluation of the distortion of EEG signals caused by a hole in the skull mimicking the fontanel in the skull of human neonates.
Flemming L; Wang Y; Caprihan A; Eiselt M; Haueisen J; Okada Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 116(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15826855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of unfused cranial bones on magnetoencephalography signals in human infants.
Lew S; Hämäläinen MS; Ahlfors SP; Okada Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2021 Mar; 132(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 33571879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Somatosensory evoked potentials/fields--exploration of brain function].
Inoue K; Shirai T; Harada T; Mimori Y; Matsumoto M
Rinsho Byori; 2004 Jan; 52(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 14968564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetoencephalography signals are influenced by skull defects.
Lau S; Flemming L; Haueisen J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 125(8):1653-62. PubMed ID: 24418220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MEG and TMS combined with EEG for mapping alcohol effects.
Kähkönen S
Alcohol; 2005 Nov; 37(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 16713500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data.
Gonçalves S; de Munck JC; Verbunt JP; Heethaar RM; da Silva FH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 50(9):1124-8. PubMed ID: 12943281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of fontanel on scalp EEG potentials in the neonate.
Gargiulo P; Belfiore P; Friðgeirsson EA; Vanhatalo S; Ramon C
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Sep; 126(9):1703-10. PubMed ID: 25553851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements.
Malmivuo J; Suihko V; Eskola H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Mar; 44(3):196-208. PubMed ID: 9216133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined MEG and EEG methodology for non-invasive recording of infraslow activity in the human cortex.
Leistner S; Sander T; Burghoff M; Curio G; Trahms L; Mackert BM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2774-80. PubMed ID: 17905653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's.
Cuffin BN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jan; 40(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 8468075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of sutures and fontanels on MEG and EEG source analysis in a realistic infant head model.
Lew S; Sliva DD; Choe MS; Grant PE; Okada Y; Wolters CH; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():282-93. PubMed ID: 23531680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head.
Haueisen J; Ramon C; Eiselt M; Brauer H; Nowak H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Aug; 44(8):727-35. PubMed ID: 9254986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull.
Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetoencephalography in healthy neonates.
Haddad N; Shihabuddin B; Preissl H; Holst M; Lowery CL; Eswaran H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 16414000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of MEG and EEG on the basis of somatic evoked responses elicited by stimulation of the snout in the juvenile swine.
Okada Y; Lähteenmäki A; Xu C
Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Feb; 110(2):214-29. PubMed ID: 10210611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements.
Oostendorp TF; Delbeke J; Stegeman DF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Nov; 47(11):1487-92. PubMed ID: 11077742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
