342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15828074)
1. Comparison of asbestos exposure assessments by next-of-kin respondents, by an occupational hygienist, and by a job-exposure matrix from the National Occupational Hazard Survey.
Nam JM; Rice C; Gail MH
Am J Ind Med; 2005 May; 47(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 15828074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occupational asbestos exposure and mesothelioma risk in Los Angeles County: application of an occupational hazard survey job-exposure matrix.
Cicioni C; London SJ; Garabrant DH; Bernstein L; Phillips K; Peters JM
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 20(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 1928113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Not just a research method: If used with caution, can job-exposure matrices be a useful tool in the practice of occupational medicine and public health?
Fadel M; Evanoff BA; Andersen JH; d'Errico A; Dale AM; Leclerc A; Descatha A
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 46(5):552-553. PubMed ID: 32367143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.
Berman DW; Crump KS
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2008; 38 Suppl 1():1-47. PubMed ID: 18671157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement of job-exposure matrix (JEM) assessed exposure and self-reported exposure among adult leukemia patients and controls in Shanghai.
Adegoke OJ; Blair A; Ou Shu X; Sanderson M; Addy CL; Dosemeci M; Zheng W
Am J Ind Med; 2004 Mar; 45(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 14991855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of exposure assessment methods in a lung cancer case-control study: performance of a lifelong task-based questionnaire for asbestos and PAHs.
Bourgkard E; Wild P; Gonzalez M; Févotte J; Penven E; Paris C
Occup Environ Med; 2013 Dec; 70(12):884-91. PubMed ID: 24142972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of rating method for assessing occupational asbestos exposure: study for compensation purposes in France.
Gramond C; Rolland P; Lacourt A; Ducamp S; Chamming's S; Creau Y; Hery M; Laureillard J; Mohammed-Brahim B; Orlowski E; Paris C; Pairon JC; Goldberg M; Brochard P;
Am J Ind Med; 2012 May; 55(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 22237902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mesothelioma in household members of asbestos-exposed workers: 32 United States cases since 1990.
Miller A
Am J Ind Med; 2005 May; 47(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 15828068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of exposure assessment approaches: lung cancer and occupational asbestos exposure in a population-based case-control study.
Hardt JS; Vermeulen R; Peters S; Kromhout H; McLaughlin JR; Demers PA
Occup Environ Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 24334241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peculiar features of mesothelioma occurrence as related to exposure patterns and circumstances in the Lombard Region, Italy.
Pesatori AC; Mensi C
Med Lav; 2005; 96(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 16457432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linking expert judgement and trends in occupational exposure into a job-exposure matrix for historical exposure to asbestos in the Netherlands.
Swuste P; Dahhan M; Burdorf A
Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jul; 52(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 18524755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personal factors influencing agreement between expert and self-reported assessments of an occupational exposure.
Neilson HK; Sass-Kortsak A; Lou WY; Purdham JT
Chronic Dis Can; 2007; 28(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 17953793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An overview of the risk of lung cancer in relation to exposure to asbestos and of taconite miners.
Berry G; Gibbs GW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Oct; 52(1 Suppl):S218-22. PubMed ID: 17998152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of exposure assessment methods for occupational carcinogens in a multi-centre lung cancer case-control study.
Peters S; Vermeulen R; Cassidy A; Mannetje A'; van Tongeren M; Boffetta P; Straif K; Kromhout H;
Occup Environ Med; 2011 Feb; 68(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 20871102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of a method to evaluate the quality of work histories and document the exposure assessment process.
Rice C; Heineman EF
Am J Ind Med; 2003 Jul; 44(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 12822141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of expert and job-exposure matrix-based retrospective exposure assessment of occupational carcinogens in The Netherlands Cohort Study.
Offermans NS; Vermeulen R; Burdorf A; Peters S; Goldbohm RA; Koeman T; van Tongeren M; Kauppinen T; Kant I; Kromhout H; van den Brandt PA
Occup Environ Med; 2012 Oct; 69(10):745-51. PubMed ID: 22693270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National epidemiologic surveillance systems of asbestos-related disease and the exposed workers register.
Marinaccio A; Branchi C; Massari S; Scarselli A
Med Lav; 2006; 97(3):482-7. PubMed ID: 17009684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risks for the development of outcomes related to occupational allergies: an application of the asthma-specific job exposure matrix compared with self-reports and investigator scores on job-training-related exposure.
Suarthana E; Heederik D; Ghezzo H; Malo JL; Kennedy SM; Gautrin D
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Apr; 66(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 19017693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mesothelioma in construction workers: risk estimate, lung content of asbestos fibres, claims for compensation for occupational disease in the Veneto Region mesothelioma register].
Merler E; Bressan V; Somigliana A;
Med Lav; 2009; 100(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 19382522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exposure to vapors, gas, dust, or fumes: assessment by a single survey item compared to a detailed exposure battery and a job exposure matrix.
Blanc PD; Eisner MD; Balmes JR; Trupin L; Yelin EH; Katz PP
Am J Ind Med; 2005 Aug; 48(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16032739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
