BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15829245)

  • 1. Mutation detection, interpretation, and applications in the clinical laboratory setting.
    Strom CM
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jun; 573(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 15829245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic DHPLC Quality Assurance (DDQA): a collaborative approach to the generation of validated and standardized methods for DHPLC-based mutation screening in clinical genetics laboratories.
    Schollen E; Dequeker E; McQuaid S; Vankeirsbilck B; Michils G; Harvey J; van den Akker E; van Schooten R; Clark Z; Schrooten S; Matthijs G;
    Hum Mutat; 2005 Jun; 25(6):583-92. PubMed ID: 15880509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mycobacterial tests].
    Takashima T; Higuchi T
    Kekkaku; 2008 Jan; 83(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 18283915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA-based carrier screening in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.
    Zhang B; Dearing L; Amos J
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2004 May; 4(3):377-92. PubMed ID: 15137904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. COLD-PCR: a new platform for highly improved mutation detection in cancer and genetic testing.
    Li J; Makrigiorgos GM
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2009 Apr; 37(Pt 2):427-32. PubMed ID: 19290875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Is the semen analysis a reliable test?].
    Keel BA
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2005 Feb; 11(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15755022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing environment for single-gene disorders in U.S. reference laboratories.
    Amos J; Gold B
    Hum Mutat; 1998; 12(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 9792404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commercial molecular diagnostics in the U.S.: The Human Genome Project to the clinical laboratory.
    Amos J; Patnaik M
    Hum Mutat; 2002 Apr; 19(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 11933187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of the commonest cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene DeltaF508 mutation: evaluation of PCR--single-strand conformational polymorphism and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
    Kakavas KV; Noulas AV; Kanakis I; Bonanou S; Karamanos NK
    Biomed Chromatogr; 2006 Oct; 20(10):1120-5. PubMed ID: 16708396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extended gene analysis can increase specificity of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis.
    Mérelle ME; Scheffer H; De Jong D; Dankert-Roelse JE
    Acta Paediatr; 2006 Nov; 95(11):1424-8. PubMed ID: 17062471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitfalls of automated comparative sequence analysis as a single platform for routine clinical testing for NF1.
    Messiaen LM; Wimmer K
    J Med Genet; 2005 May; 42(5):e25. PubMed ID: 15863657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis in US genetic testing laboratories: a survey of laboratory directors.
    Kaufman DJ; Katsanis SH; Javitt GH; Murphy JA; Scott JA; Hudson KL
    Clin Genet; 2008 Oct; 74(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 18700896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Procedure for accurate evaluation of laboratory data and its international trends].
    Kuwa K
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):531-9. PubMed ID: 16026081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular engineering approaches for DNA sequencing and analysis.
    Bai X; Edwards J; Ju J
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Sep; 5(5):797-808. PubMed ID: 16149881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) testing of routine sera varies in different laboratories but concordance is greater for cytoplasmic fluorescence (C-ANCA) and myeloperoxidase specificity (MPO-ANCA).
    Pollock W; Jovanovich S; Savige J
    J Immunol Methods; 2009 Aug; 347(1-2):19-23. PubMed ID: 19490915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adoption of array technologies into the clinical laboratory.
    Hadd AG; Brown JT; Andruss BF; Ye F; WalkerPeach CR
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 May; 5(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 15934817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parallel sequencing used in detection of mosaic mutations: comparison with four diagnostic DNA screening techniques.
    Rohlin A; Wernersson J; Engwall Y; Wiklund L; Björk J; Nordling M
    Hum Mutat; 2009 Jun; 30(6):1012-20. PubMed ID: 19347965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relatively poor performance of clinical laboratories for DNA analyses in the detection of two thrombophilic mutations--a cause for concern.
    Tripodi A; Peyvandi F; Chantarangkul V; Menegatti M; Mannucci PM
    Thromb Haemost; 2002 Oct; 88(4):690-1. PubMed ID: 12362247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The potential of electrophoretic mobility shift assays for clinical mutation detection.
    Hestekin CN; Barron AE
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Oct; 27(19):3805-15. PubMed ID: 17031787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screen p53 mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma by FASAY: a novel splicing mutation.
    Wu XM; Fu JG; Ge WZ; Zhu JY; Wang JY; Zhang W; Qian W; Huo KK
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2007 Feb; 8(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17266182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.