109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1582933)
1. Simple and rapid inversion of additive relationship matrices incorporating parental uncertainty.
Famula TR
J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1045-8. PubMed ID: 1582933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid inversion of additive by additive relationship matrices by including sire-dam combination effects.
VanRaden PM; Hoeschele I
J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):570-9. PubMed ID: 2045563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid inversion of dominance relationship matrices for noninbred populations by including sire by dam subclass effects.
Hoeschele I; VanRaden PM
J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):557-69. PubMed ID: 2045562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A fast algorithm for computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations.
Sargolzaei M; Iwaisaki H; Colleau JJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 16191041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The contribution of progeny of uncertain paternity to the accuracy of sire evaluation.
Famula TR
J Anim Sci; 1993 May; 71(5):1136-41. PubMed ID: 8505245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced animal model with differential genetic grouping for direct and maternal effects.
Cantet RJ; Schaeffer LR; Smith C
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1730-41. PubMed ID: 1634397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets.
Bradford HL; Masuda Y; Cole JB; Misztal I; VanRaden PM
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2308-2318. PubMed ID: 30639024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inclusion of genetically identical animals to a numerator relationship matrix and modification of its inverse.
Oikawa T; Yasuda K
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Mar; 41(1):25. PubMed ID: 19284529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.
Misztal I; Legarra A; Aguilar I
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3943-52. PubMed ID: 24679933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations.
Sánchez L; Bijma P; Woolliams JA
Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1589-95. PubMed ID: 12930762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of evaluation-selection systems for maximizing genetic response at the same level of inbreeding.
Quinton M; Smith C
J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2208-12. PubMed ID: 8567454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic diversity and population structure of American Red Angus cattle.
Márquez GC; Speidel SE; Enns RM; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 19783699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A performance programmed method for computing inbreeding coefficients from large data sets for use in mixed-model analyses.
Golden BL; Brinks JS; Bourdon RM
J Anim Sci; 1991 Sep; 69(9):3564-73. PubMed ID: 1938642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: II. Progeny traits in multiple contemporary groups within a herd.
Lofgren DL; Harris DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3223-42. PubMed ID: 2613571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical note: an R package for fitting generalized linear mixed models in animal breeding.
Vazquez AI; Bates DM; Rosa GJ; Gianola D; Weigel KA
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 19820058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic diversity, inbreeding and breeding practices in dogs: results from pedigree analyses.
Leroy G
Vet J; 2011 Aug; 189(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 21737321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
