These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1582933)

  • 41. Absorption of equations for non-parents for an animal model with maternal effects and genetic groups.
    Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4014-25. PubMed ID: 2286544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Whole-genome sequence, SNP chips and pedigree structure: building demographic profiles in domestic dog breeds to optimize genetic-trait mapping.
    Dreger DL; Rimbault M; Davis BW; Bhatnagar A; Parker HG; Ostrander EA
    Dis Model Mech; 2016 Dec; 9(12):1445-1460. PubMed ID: 27874836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pedigree error due to extra-pair reproduction substantially biases estimates of inbreeding depression.
    Reid JM; Keller LF; Marr AB; Nietlisbach P; Sardell RJ; Arcese P
    Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):802-15. PubMed ID: 24171712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Multiple Paternity in the Norway Rat, Rattus norvegicus, from Urban Slums in Salvador, Brazil.
    Costa F; Richardson JL; Dion K; Mariani C; Pertile AC; Burak MK; Childs JE; Ko AI; Caccone A
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 26733693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Genetic conservation of domestic livestock.
    Hall SJ
    Oxf Rev Reprod Biol; 1990; 12():289-318. PubMed ID: 2075002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pedigree data indicate rapid inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity within populations of native, traditional dog breeds of conservation concern.
    Jansson M; Laikre L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202849. PubMed ID: 30208042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Method for the estimation of genetic merit of animals with uncertain paternity under Bayesian inference.
    Shiotsuki L; Cardoso FF; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):116-123. PubMed ID: 29575105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A single nucleotide polymorphism set for paternal identification to reduce the costs of trait recording in commercial pig breeding.
    Harlizius B; Lopes MS; Duijvesteijn N; van de Goor LH; van Haeringen WA; Panneman H; Guimarães SE; Merks JW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jun; 89(6):1661-8. PubMed ID: 21239666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
    Gomez-Raya L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Alternative Ways of Computing the Numerator Relationship Matrix.
    Nilforooshan MA; Garrick D; Harris B
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():655638. PubMed ID: 34394180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of incomplete pedigree on genetic management of the Dutch Landrace goat.
    Mucha S; Windig JJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 19646154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mate selection by groups.
    Kinghorn BP
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Sep; 81 Suppl 2():55-63. PubMed ID: 9777512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inbreeding and relationship in Polish Black-and-White sires.
    Kania-Gierdziewicz J
    J Appl Genet; 2005; 46(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 15876686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of molecular markers to improve relationship information in the genetic evaluation of beef cattle tick resistance under pedigree-based models.
    Junqueira VS; Cardoso FF; Oliveira MM; Sollero BP; Silva FF; Lopes PS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Feb; 134(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 27658502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using multiple objective programming in a dairy cow breeding program.
    Tozer PR; Stokes JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Dec; 84(12):2782-8. PubMed ID: 11814035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of pedigree- and DNA-based measures for identifying inbreeding depression in the critically endangered Attwater's Prairie-chicken.
    Hammerly SC; Morrow ME; Johnson JA
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(21):5313-28. PubMed ID: 24118220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of parentage misidentification on estimates of genetic parameters for milk yield in the Mediterranean Italian buffalo population.
    Parlato E; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4059-64. PubMed ID: 22720962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach.
    Silva FF; Mulder HA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Guimarães SE; Lopes PS; Mathur PK; Viana JM; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3825-34. PubMed ID: 24492557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sequential transformation for multiple traits for estimation of (co)variance components with a derivative-free algorithm for restricted maximum likelihood.
    Van Vleck LD; Boldman KG
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 8478285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.