These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1582936)

  • 1. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of additive genetic variance when selected base animals are considered fixed.
    van der Werf JH
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1068-76. PubMed ID: 1582936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of additive genetic variance when base populations are selected.
    van der Werf JH; de Boer IJ
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Oct; 68(10):3124-32. PubMed ID: 2254191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variance decomposition in the estimation of genetic variance with selected data.
    van der Werf JH; Thompson R
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Oct; 70(10):2975-85. PubMed ID: 1429273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of genetic groups on estimates of additive genetic variance.
    Pieramati C; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Jan; 71(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 8454554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation study on covariance component estimation for two binary traits in an underlying continuous scale.
    Mäntysaari EA; Quaas RL; Gröhn YT
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):580-91. PubMed ID: 2045564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unexpected estimates of variance components with a true model containing genetic competition effects.
    Van Vleck LD; Cassady JP
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 15583044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of direct and correlated responses to selection using univariate animal models.
    Sorensen DA; Johansson K
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2038-44. PubMed ID: 1644676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: simulation study.
    Donoghue KA; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):351-6. PubMed ID: 14974530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The empirical bias of estimates by restricted maximum likelihood, Bayesian method, and method R under selection for additive, maternal, and dominance models.
    Duangjinda M; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2991-6. PubMed ID: 11811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations.
    Fikse WF; Banos G
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Genetic analysis of markers of the performance test for herding dogs. 1. Performance traits].
    Hoffmann U; Hamann H; Distl O
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2003; 116(3-4):81-9. PubMed ID: 12680272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of genetic parameters using sampled data from populations undergoing selection.
    Jensen J; Mao IL
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Oct; 74(10):3544-51. PubMed ID: 1744281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of adjusting for heterogeneity of variance in genetic evaluation of Japanese Black cattle.
    Nakaoka H; Narita A; Ibi T; Sasae Y; Miyake T; Yamada T; Sasaki Y
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2429-36. PubMed ID: 17565062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of parentage misidentification on estimates of genetic parameters for milk yield in the Mediterranean Italian buffalo population.
    Parlato E; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4059-64. PubMed ID: 22720962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree information.
    Schenkel FS; Schaeffer LR; Boettcher PJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 11929624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for a continuous trait subject to culling before testing.
    Arnason T; Albertsdóttir E; Fikse WF; Eriksson S; Sigurdsson A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Feb; 129(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 22225584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.