These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1582936)

  • 21. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation of correlation between maternal permanent environmental effects of related dams in beef cattle.
    Iwaisaki H; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):537-42. PubMed ID: 15705749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Method R variance components procedure: application on the simple breeding value model.
    Reverter A; Golden BL; Bourdon RM; Brinks JS
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Sep; 72(9):2247-53. PubMed ID: 8002443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of population structure on estimates of direct and maternal parameters.
    Heydarpour M; Schaeffer LR; Yazdi MH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Apr; 125(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 18363974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci detection in livestock populations.
    Kolbehdari D; Jansen GB; Schaeffer LR; Allen BO
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16706924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of additive genetic variance in commercial layer poultry and simulated populations under selection.
    Jeyaruban MG; Gibson JP
    Theor Appl Genet; 1996 Mar; 92(3-4):483-91. PubMed ID: 24166275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of methods for handling censored records in beef fertility data: field data.
    Donoghue KA; Rekaya R; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):357-61. PubMed ID: 14974531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations.
    Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 19749023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduced animal model with differential genetic grouping for direct and maternal effects.
    Cantet RJ; Schaeffer LR; Smith C
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1730-41. PubMed ID: 1634397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
    Luo W; Wang Y; Zhang Y
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2009 Mar; 52(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 19294355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
    Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.
    Neuner S; Emmerling R; Thaller G; Götz KU
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Nov; 91(11):4344-54. PubMed ID: 18946140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of correction for heterogeneity of variance on bias and accuracy of breeding value estimation for Dutch dairy cattle.
    van der Werf JH; Meuwissen TH; de Jong G
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Oct; 77(10):3174-84. PubMed ID: 7836606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of methods for computing approximate accuracies of predicted breeding values in maternal random regression models for growth traits in beef cattle.
    Sánchez JP; Misztal I; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1057-66. PubMed ID: 18203980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trends in population parameters and best linear unbiased prediction of progeny performance in a European F(2) maize population under modified recurrent full-sib selection.
    Flachenecker C; Frisch M; Falke KC; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 Feb; 112(3):483-91. PubMed ID: 16344984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins.
    Varona L; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Apr; 81(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of breeding values for mean and dispersion, their variance and correlation using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Felleki M; Lee D; Lee Y; Gilmour AR; Rönnegård L
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Dec; 94(6):307-17. PubMed ID: 23374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle.
    Patry C; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Feb; 94(2):1011-20. PubMed ID: 21257070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sequential transformation for multiple traits for estimation of (co)variance components with a derivative-free algorithm for restricted maximum likelihood.
    Van Vleck LD; Boldman KG
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 8478285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.