BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15833307)

  • 21. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception.
    Palmer EM; Kellman PJ; Shipley TF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):513-41. PubMed ID: 17087570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations.
    Haladjian HH; Pylyshyn ZW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 21264734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: when sound congruence affects grouping in vision.
    Grassi M; Casco C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 20139453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceive-decide-act, perceive-decide-act: how abstract is repetition-related decision learning?
    Denkinger B; Koutstaal W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):742-56. PubMed ID: 19379047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.
    Harris IM; Dux PE
    Cognition; 2005 Feb; 95(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 15629474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time.
    Schreij D; Olivers CN
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 19682674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptually averaging in a continuous visual world: extracting statistical summary representations over time.
    Albrecht AR; Scholl BJ
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 20424102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli.
    Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The nature of change detection and online representations of scenes.
    Ryan JD; Cohen NJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):988-1015. PubMed ID: 15462635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Forming and updating object representations without awareness: evidence from motion-induced blindness.
    Mitroff SR; Scholl BJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(8):961-7. PubMed ID: 15695181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes.
    Garsoffky B; Schwan S; Hesse FW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1035-50. PubMed ID: 12450330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio).
    Parron C; Deruelle C; Fagot J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 17924787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies.
    Gordon RD; Irwin DE
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Nov; 58(8):1260-77. PubMed ID: 8961836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The eyeglass reversal.
    Oh S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1336-43. PubMed ID: 21448766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Object files can be purely episodic.
    Mitroff SR; Scholl BJ; Noles NS
    Perception; 2007; 36(12):1730-5. PubMed ID: 18283924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.