These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15833450)

  • 1. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Grigoris P; Roberts P; Panousis K; Bosch H
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):125-34, vii. PubMed ID: 15833450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the evolution of contemporary designs.
    Grigoris P; Roberts P; Panousis K; Jin Z
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Feb; 220(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 16669379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms.
    Cuckler JM
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e439-41. PubMed ID: 21902124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The optimal metal-metal arthroplasty is still a total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.
    Cuckler JM
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4 Suppl 1):74-6. PubMed ID: 16781434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs.
    Bengs BC; Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):755-62. PubMed ID: 19085491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: what have we learned?
    Amstutz HC; Campbell P; Le Duff MJ
    Instr Course Lect; 2007; 56():149-61. PubMed ID: 17472303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The optimal metal-metal arthroplasty is still a total hip arthroplasty: in opposition.
    Schmalzried TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4 Suppl 1):77-9. PubMed ID: 16781435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current concepts of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    Clarke IC; Donaldson T; Bowsher JG; Nasser S; Takahashi T
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):143-62, viii. PubMed ID: 15833452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.
    Amanatullah DF; Cheung Y; Di Cesare PE
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 20399365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complications after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Wisk LE; Takamura KM
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2011 Apr; 42(2):207-30, viii. PubMed ID: 21435496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.
    Kluess D; Zietz C; Lindner T; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 19085490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unexpected finding of a fractured metal prosthetic femoral head in a nonmodular implant during revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Giori NJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):659.e13-5. PubMed ID: 20022458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
    Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
    Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Shimmin AJ; Bare J; Back DL
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):187-93, ix. PubMed ID: 15833456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of hip resurfacing for developmental dysplasia of the hip of Crowe type I and II.
    Xu WD; Li J; Zhou ZH; Wu YS; Li M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1379-83. PubMed ID: 18959113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Progress of hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
    Chen G; Yang J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 22(6):665-8. PubMed ID: 18630558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Hip resurfacing: current state of knowledge].
    Girard J; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Dec; 94(8):715-30. PubMed ID: 19070714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6 Suppl 1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18639431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
    Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.