BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15834336)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine.
    Bozkus H; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Nottmeier EW; Sonntag VK; Papadopoulos SM; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):915-22. PubMed ID: 15834336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomechanical comparison of modern anterior and posterior plate fixation of the cervical spine.
    Do Koh Y; Lim TH; Won You J; Eck J; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11148640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for distractive-flexion injury stage 3 of the cervical spine.
    Henriques T; Cunningham BW; McAfee PC; Olerud C
    Ups J Med Sci; 2015; 120(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 25742755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does pedicle screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine provide adequate stabilization in a multilevel vertebral body fracture model? An in vitro biomechanical study.
    Duff J; Hussain MM; Klocke N; Harris JA; Yandamuri SS; Bobinski L; Daniel RT; Bucklen BS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Mar; 53():72-78. PubMed ID: 29455101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems.
    Richter M; Wilke HJ; Kluger P; Claes L; Puhl W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 10025014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine.
    Kothe R; Rüther W; Schneider E; Linke B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1869-75. PubMed ID: 15534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.
    Koller H; Schmidt R; Mayer M; Hitzl W; Zenner J; Midderhoff S; Graf N; Resch H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Dec; 19(12):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20589516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation.
    Mihara H; Cheng BC; David SM; Ohnari K; Zdeblick TA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1662-7. PubMed ID: 11474352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
    Galler RM; Dogan S; Fifield MS; Bozkus H; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.