These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1583434)

  • 1. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
    Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.
    Silas JH; Barker AT; Ramsay LE
    Br Heart J; 1980 Feb; 43(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 7362713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN; Hyman DJ; Toronjo C
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blood pressure measurement in children: the importance of cuff bladder size.
    Whincup PH; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Hypertens; 1989 Oct; 7(10):845-50. PubMed ID: 2584699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer as a gold standard may result in misleading conclusions.
    Conroy RM; Atkins N; Mee F; O'Brien E; O'Malley K
    Blood Press; 1994 Sep; 3(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 7866591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
    Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer.
    van Popele NM; Bos WJ; de Beer NA; van Der Kuip DA; Hofman A; Grobbee DE; Witteman JC
    Hypertension; 2000 Oct; 36(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 11040223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the DINAMAP blood pressure monitor in an ambulatory primary care setting.
    Ornstein S; Markert G; Litchfield L; Zemp L
    J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 3367116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Dinamap 8100 and Omron M1 blood pressure monitors for use in children.
    Barker ME; Shiell AW; Law CM
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 14(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 10791663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the Copal UA-251 and the Dinamap 1848 automatic blood-pressure monitors.
    Maheswaran R; Zezulka AV; Gill JS; Beevers M; Davies P; Beevers DG
    J Med Eng Technol; 1988; 12(4):160-3. PubMed ID: 3193436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of an automatic instrument for blood pressure measurement in children. The Bogalusa Heart Study.
    Wattigney WA; Webber LS; Lawrence MD; Berenson GS
    Am J Hypertens; 1996 Mar; 9(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 8695025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Field evaluation of the Copal UA-231 automatic sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers S; Smith GD; Doyle W
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1988 Dec; 42(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 3256572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of blood pressure with various techniques in daily practice: uncertainty in diagnosing office hypertension with short-term in-hospital registration of blood pressure.
    Braun HJ; Rabouw H; Werner H; van Montfrans GA; de Stigter C; Zwinderman AH
    Blood Press Monit; 1999 Apr; 4(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 10450115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two automated monitors in the measurement of blood pressure reactivity. Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group.
    Rosner BA; Appel LJ; Raczynski JM; Hebert PR; Whelton PK; Murphy JK; Miller ST; Oberman A
    Ann Epidemiol; 1990 Oct; 1(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 1669490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of the random zero sphygmomanometer.
    Kronmal RA; Rutan GH; Manolio TA; Borhani NO
    Hypertension; 1993 May; 21(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 8491498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.
    Park MK; Menard SW; Yuan C
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2001 Jan; 155(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 11177062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.