These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence. Roden GJ St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life. Shah MK Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 29(3):931-69. PubMed ID: 16189918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Harm to fetuses becomes issue in Utah and elsewhere. Johnson K N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():A9. PubMed ID: 15250083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The fetal homicide fallacy: a comparison of California's inconsistent statutes to other states. Converse HA Thomas Jefferson Law Rev; 2003; 25(2):451-68. PubMed ID: 15732183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional considerations underlie Missouri's expansion of fetal rights within its wrongful death statute. Brown ES Miss Law Rev; 1996; 61(2):473-87. PubMed ID: 16086525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts. Kim RH Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrongful death and the lost society of the unborn. Meadows GA J Leg Med; 1992 Mar; 13(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 1619354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right to maintain action or to recover damages for death of unborn child. Shapiro SR Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 84():411-72. PubMed ID: 12091934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Raising questions about society's "duty to rescue" the unborn. Suziedelis AK Health Care Ethics USA; 2004; 12(1):E3. PubMed ID: 15685768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far? Trindel RM Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to live, the right to choose, and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act. Holzapfel M J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 18(2):431-66. PubMed ID: 12173443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion as murder?: a response. Stone J J Soc Philos; 1995; 25(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 15027432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Injuries to unborn children. Cane PF Aust Law J; 1977 Oct; 51(10):704-20. PubMed ID: 11665004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An inside look at partial birth abortion. Lowe LR Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998-1999; 24():327-57. PubMed ID: 16180289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability. Ackmann EA Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism. Westerfield L South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rights of embryo and foetus in private law. Jost TS Am J Comp Law; 2002; 50(3):633-46. PubMed ID: 15212066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Act of 4 April 1987. United States. North Dakota Annu Rev Popul Law; 1987; 14():343-4. PubMed ID: 12346698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]